Notes of Decisions
Cited in
7
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 2006–2026 · leading case:
State v. Letalien, 2009 ME 130 (Me. 2009).
State v. Letalien, 2009 ME 130 (Me. 2009).
· cites it 16× “680, § 13 (effective July 4, 1996) (codified at 34-A M.R.S.A. § 11121 (Supp.1996)), but later repealed, see P.”
Doe v. Dist. Attorney, 932 A.2d 552 (Me. 2007).
· cites it 6× “34-A M.R.S.A. § 11121(2), (3) (Supp.1998).”
John Doe I v. Robert Williams, 2013 ME 24 (Me. 2013).
“2d 4 (quoting 34-A M.R.S.A § 11121(6)(C) (Supp.1996)). While Letalien was on probation, the Legislature enacted SORNA of 1999, which required him to register for life, prevented him from seeking a waiver, and established additional reporting requirements.”
State v. Diecidue, 2007 ME 137 (Me. 2007).
“[¶ 3] Although the sentencing court did not check a sex offender registration box on the judgment and commitment form, Diecidue signed a form entitled “registration by convicted sex offender” and signed a notice of his duty to register as a sex offender pursuant to 34-A M.R.S.A.…”
State of Maine v. Craig A. Proctor, 2020 ME 107 (Me. 2020).
“680, § 13 (effective July 4, 1996) (codified 5 Because the Legislature has replaced or amended various versions of the sex offender registration statutes since 1991, the statutory citations in this opinion are to the versions of the statutes as of the date of their enactment.”
State of Maine v. Daniel Gantnier, 2026 ME 4 (Me. 2026).
“Although SORNA of 1996 continued to limit the post-release registration obligation to fifteen years, 34-A M.R.S.A. § 11121(2) (Supp. 1996), it created a stricter set of obligations, see, e.”
Doe v. Fowle (Me. Super. Ct 2006).
“6, it also appeared to be troubled by the difference between SO RNA as applied to Haskell, and the version of SO RNA of 1999 at issue in 2007, which did not contain the provisions for "for waiver from registration 'for good cause shown,' 34-A M.R.S.A. § 11121 (6)(0) (Supp.…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 34-A, § 11121(1) — 1 case
State v. Diecidue, 2007 ME 137 (Me. 2007).
“[¶ 3] Although the sentencing court did not check a sex offender registration box on the judgment and commitment form, Diecidue signed a form entitled “registration by convicted sex offender” and signed a notice of his duty to register as a sex offender pursuant to 34-A M.R.S.A.…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 34-A, § 11121(2) — 3 cases
State v. Letalien, 2009 ME 130 (Me. 2009).
“680, § 13 (effective July 4, 1996) (codified at 34-A M.R.S.A. § 11121 (Supp.1996)), but later repealed, see P.”
State of Maine v. Daniel Gantnier, 2026 ME 4 (Me. 2026).
“Although SORNA of 1996 continued to limit the post-release registration obligation to fifteen years, 34-A M.R.S.A. § 11121(2) (Supp. 1996), it created a stricter set of obligations, see, e.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 34-A, § 11121(6)(A) — 1 case
State v. Letalien, 2009 ME 130 (Me. 2009).
“680, § 13 (effective July 4, 1996) (codified at 34-A M.R.S.A. § 11121 (Supp.1996)), but later repealed, see P.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 34-A, § 11121(6)(C) — 3 cases
State v. Letalien, 2009 ME 130 (Me. 2009).
“680, § 13 (effective July 4, 1996) (codified at 34-A M.R.S.A. § 11121 (Supp.1996)), but later repealed, see P.”
John Doe I v. Robert Williams, 2013 ME 24 (Me. 2013).
“2d 4 (quoting 34-A M.R.S.A § 11121(6)(C) (Supp.1996)). While Letalien was on probation, the Legislature enacted SORNA of 1999, which required him to register for life, prevented him from seeking a waiver, and established additional reporting requirements.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 34-A, § 11121(6)(D) — 3 cases
State v. Letalien, 2009 ME 130 (Me. 2009).
“680, § 13 (effective July 4, 1996) (codified at 34-A M.R.S.A. § 11121 (Supp.1996)), but later repealed, see P.”
State of Maine v. Craig A. Proctor, 2020 ME 107 (Me. 2020).
“680, § 13 (effective July 4, 1996) (codified 5 Because the Legislature has replaced or amended various versions of the sex offender registration statutes since 1991, the statutory citations in this opinion are to the versions of the statutes as of the date of their enactment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.