Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 34-B
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 34-B, § 1205 (2026)

Office of Advocacy

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1983, c. 459, §7 (NEW). PL 1987, c. 744, §§13-15 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 7, §N3 (RPR). PL 1989, c. 731, §§1-3 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 560, §K18 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 397, §§A43-46 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 457, §OO2 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 457, §OO5 (AFF). PL 2005, c. 519, §RR2 (RPR). PL 2005, c. 519, §RR4 (AFF). PL 2007, c. 356, §4 (RP). PL 2007, c. 356, §31 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2001–2001 · leading case: Lindquist v. Bangor Mental Health Inst., 2001 ME 72 (Me. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lindquist v. Bangor Mental Health Inst., 2001 ME 72 (Me. 2001). · cites it 2× “34-B M.R.S.A. § 1205 (Pamph.2000). The court concluded that the statute does not authorize advocates employed by the Office of Advocacy to represent clients in *618 court.”
Off. of Advocacy v. Bangor Mental Health Inst. (Me. Super. Ct 2001). · cites it 5× “A; (2) that the Office of Advocacy has both statutory and regulatory standing to proceed on behalf of the patient, and (3) the patient would have standing in her own right because the purpose of the OOA is germane to the claim brought; and (4) the OOA does not need Attorney…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.