Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 35
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 64 (2026)

Changes in rates; notice

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1981, c. 408 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 681 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 19 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 149 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 141, §A5 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases, 1976–1986 · leading case: New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 362 A.2d 741 (Me. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 362 A.2d 741 (Me. 1976). · cites it 6× “On October 8, 1974, New England Telephone and Telegraph Company (“New England”) filed with the Public Utilities Commission (“Commission”), in compliance with 35 M.R.S.A. § 64, 1 a revision of New England’s then effective schedule of intrastate rates, tolls and charges.”
New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 448 A.2d 272 (Me. 1982). · cites it 2× “On July 1, 1980, New England Telephone & Telegraph Company (NET), pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 64 (Supp.1981-82), filed with the Public Utilities Commission (hereinafter the “PUC” or the “Commission”) revised tariffs to become effective July 31, 1980, seeking a $39.”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Maine Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 436 A.2d 880 (Me. 1981). · cites it 3× “On June 29, 1981, Central Maine Power Company (CMP) filed with the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) a schedule of proposed rates pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 64. With this filing, CMP sought to increase rates which the PUC had established on October 31, 1980, as just and…”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 405 A.2d 153 (Me. 1979). · cites it 2× “On January 16,1978, Central Maine Power Company, 1 pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 64, filed with the Public Utilities Commission 2 a revised schedule of rates and certain re *156 vised rules and regulations to become effective on February 15,1978.”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 455 A.2d 34 (Me. 1983). · cites it 2× “On June 29, 1981, Central Maine Power Company ("CMP", "Company") filed with the Commission proposed new rate schedules pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 64 (Supp. 1982-83). The proposed rates were designed to produce a net increase in annual operating revenues equal to 15.”
New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 390 A.2d 8 (Me. 1978). “Thus, a rate proceeding is usually initiated by the utility’s filing of revised schedules with the Commission under 35 M.R.S.A. § 64. The Commission then has the power to temporarily suspend the filed schedule of rates while it considers their reasonableness.”
New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 376 A.2d 448 (Me. 1977). · cites it 2× “New England’s aforementioned September 10, 1976 filing of a “proposed” schedule of rates, under the authority of 35 M.R.S.A. § 64, 1 triggered an additional rate investigation when the Commission responded to the filing by exercising its powers, under 35 M.”
Maine Water Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 482 A.2d 443 (Me. 1984). · cites it 2× “On April 22, 1983, Maine Water Company, pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 64 (1978), filed requests with the Public Utilities Commission to increase rates in its five separate divisions serving the communities of Wiscasset, Damariscotta-Newcastle, Free-port, Kezar Falls, and Oakland.”
Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 381 A.2d 1080 (Me. 1977). “They agree that under 35 M.R.S.A. § 64 47 Wash-burn’s proposed rates would have become effective thirty days after being filed on June 20, 1975 had the Commission not acted.”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 382 A.2d 302 (Me. 1978). “Acting pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. §§ 64, 69, the Commission commenced investigation of the justness and reasonableness of the proposed rate revisions.”
Millinocket Water Co. v. Maine Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 515 A.2d 749 (Me. 1986). · cites it 2× “On December 26, 1984 Millinocket Water Company (Company) filed a request with the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 64 (Supp.1985) to increase the rates of its customers.”
New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 354 A.2d 753 (Me. 1976). “§ 69, the Commission entered an order of suspension *755 thereby preventing New England’s revised schedule from becoming effective, automatically, upon the expiration of 30 days under 35 M.R.S.A. § 64 (hereinafter “Section 64.”
Show all 19 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.