Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 36, § 6216 (2026)

Protection from loss of benefits

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
It is the intent of the Legislature that any claim paid under this chapter shall supplement any benefits paid under aid to the aged, blind and disabled or any program which succeeds or supplants it. The Department of Health and Human Services shall take any such action as may be necessary to assure that recipients of aid to the aged, blind and disabled shall continue to receive as high a percentage of their current assistance as may be possible. To carry out this legislative directive, the department shall utilize all the state funds expected to be saved by a reduction in benefits of recipients of aid to the aged, blind and disabled resulting from this chapter to raise the standards of aid to the aged, blind and disabled at a total cost in state funds equivalent to the savings in state funds which would be expected as a result of this chapter.   [PL 1987, c. 516, §§3, 6 (NEW); PL 2003, c. 689, Pt. B, §6 (REV).]
Benefits received under this chapter may not be included as income for purposes of any state or municipally administered public benefit program except for general assistance under Title 22, chapter 1161, unless used for basic necessities as defined in Title 22, section 4301, subsection 1. Benefits received under this chapter may be considered for purposes of determining eligibility for abatement under section 841, subsection 2.   [PL 2013, c. 368, Pt. OO, §13 (AMD).]
These benefits do not duplicate and shall not reduce the amount of any individual's payment under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program because those payments are insufficient to meet the total amount of money determined to be needed for housing in accordance with the state standard of need under that program.   [PL 1987, c. 516, §§3, 6 (NEW); PL 1997, c. 530, Pt. A, §34 (AMD).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1987, c. 516, §§3,6 (NEW). PL 1989, c. 614 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 530, §A34 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 689, §B6 (REV). PL 2013, c. 368, Pt. OO, §13 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2003–2004 · leading case: Sager v. Town of Bowdoinham, 845 A.2d 567 (Me. 2004).
Sager v. Town of Bowdoinham, 845 A.2d 567 (Me. 2004). · cites it 2× “” 36 M.R.S.A. § 6216 (1990). Thus, the law contemplates consideration, but not automatic setoff, of the benefits received in determining eligibility for the poverty abatement.”
Sager v. Town of Bowdoinham (Me. Super. Ct 2003). · cites it 2× “36 M.R.S.A. § 6216 (1990). The Plaintiff, the Town of Bowdoinham, and the Commissioners knew the amount of the rebate received by the Plaintiff from the Circuit Breaker Program prior to the commencement of abatement proceedings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.