Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 39
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 193 (2026)

Occupational loss of hearing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1967, c. 374, §6 (RPR). PL 1971, c. 318, §3 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 659, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 313 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 496, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 885, §A7 (RP). PL 1991, c. 885, §§A9-11 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1974–1988 · leading case: Towle v. Dep't of Transp., State High., 318 A.2d 71 (Me. 1974).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Towle v. Dep't of Transp., State High., 318 A.2d 71 (Me. 1974). · cites it 2× “See 39 M.R.S.A. § 193. There was, therefore, no compensable injury and the Industrial Accident Commissioner was correct in his conclusion.”
Russell v. Camden Cmty. Hosp., 359 A.2d 607 (Me. 1976). “” 39 M.R.S.A. § 193 originally provided an exclusive schedule of compensable occupational diseases.”
Lamson v. Cent. Maine Power Co., 549 A.2d 377 (Me. 1988). “39 M.R.S.A. § 193(3) (Supp.1987) sets forth the rules applicable in determining eligibility for compensation for occupational deafness.”
LaCroix v. New England Grp. Maremont Corp., 440 A.2d 347 (Me. 1982). “Title 39 M.R.S.A. § 193 provides rules for determining eligibility for compensation “[i]n case of loss of hearing resulting from occupational disease Section 193(1) defines “occupational hearing loss” as “a sensorineural loss of hearing in one or both ears due to prolonged…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 193(3) — 1 case
Lamson v. Cent. Maine Power Co., 549 A.2d 377 (Me. 1988). “39 M.R.S.A. § 193(3) (Supp.1987) sets forth the rules applicable in determining eligibility for compensation for occupational deafness.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.