Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 4, § 101 (2026)

Constitution of court

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The Superior Court, as established, consists of 18 justices and such Active Retired Justices as may be appointed and serving on the court, learned in the law and of sobriety of manners. The Chief Justice of the Superior Court shall assign the Justices of the Superior Court to preside at various locations of the court. Whenever it becomes necessary, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court may designate a Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court or any Active Retired Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court to hold a term of Superior Court. The Chief Justice of the Superior Court may, when necessary, assign an Active Retired Justice of the Superior Court to hold a term of Superior Court. The Chief Justice of the Superior Court may designate any Justice of the Superior Court and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court may designate any Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court to hold one or more sessions of the Superior Court, separate from the session presided over by the justice holding the regular trial term.   [PL 2023, c. 412, Pt. ZZZZ, §1 (AMD).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 437, §1 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 476, §1 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 504, §1 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 599, §1 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 688, §2 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 825, §1 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 434, §1 (RPR). PL 2005, c. 519, §III1 (AMD). PL 2023, c. 412, Pt. ZZZZ, §1 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1986–2018 · leading case: Christopher R. Ayotte v. State of Maine, 2015 ME 158 (Me. 2015).
Christopher R. Ayotte v. State of Maine, 2015 ME 158 (Me. 2015). “…were either prosecuted in the Superior Court or District Court, each of which is also a single, statewide court. See 4 M.R.S. §§ 101, 151 (2014).”
Finn v. Finn, 517 A.2d 317 (Me. 1986). “*320 IV Finally, the defendant challenges the authority of the associate justice of the Supreme Judicial Court who presided over the divorce trial. Defendant concedes that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court assigned the presiding justice to the Superior Court.”
In re Adoption of G., 502 A.2d 1044 (Me. 1986). “Compare 4 M.R.S.A. §§ 101, 105, 151, 152 (1979 & Supp.”
State v. Murphy, 168 A.3d 775 (Me. 2017). “1, § 8; 4 M.R.S. § 101 (2016); 30-A M.R.S. § 272 (2016); the prior convictions are valid, see Murphy, 2010 ME 140, ¶¶ 1-3 , 10 A.”
State of Maine v. Carol Ann Murphy, 2017 ME 165 (Me. 2017). “1, § 8; 4 M.R.S. § 101 (2016); 30-A M.R.S. § 272 (2016); the prior convictions are valid, see Murphy, 2010 ME 140, ¶¶ 1-3 , 10 A.”
State v. Murphy, 168 A.3d 775 (Me. 2017). “1, § 8; 4 M.R.S. § 101 (2016); 30-A M.R.S. § 272 (2016); the prior convictions are valid, see Murphy, 2010 ME 140, ¶¶ 1-3 , 10 A.”
State v. Murphy, 168 A.3d 775 (Me. 2017). “1, § 8; 4 M.R.S. § 101 (2016); 30-A M.R.S. § 272 (2016); the prior convictions are valid, see Murphy, 2010 ME 140, ¶¶ 1-3 , 10 A.”
Carey v. Maine Bd. of Overseers of the Bar (Me. Super. Ct 2018). “§ 157(1); 4 M.R.S. § 101. While the MTCA displaced the common law of immunity in Maine, the theoretical underpinnings of judicial immunity are still particularly relevant to the judicial immunity which exists under the MTCA.”
Cote v. Town of Millinocket, 901 F. Supp. 2d 200 (D. Me. 2012). “$1,000,000 per occurrence, $1,000,000 general aggregate limit of liability for all causes of action seeking tort damages pursuant to Federal Law or State Law for which immunity of limitation of damages is not provided by the provisions of the Maine Tort Claim Act (4 M.R.S.A. §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.