Notes of Decisions
Tomer v. Maine Human Rights Comm'n, 2008 ME 190 (Me. 2008).
· cites it 6× “Except where a statute provides for direct review or review of a pro forma judicial decree by the Supreme Judicial Court or where judicial review is specifically precluded or the issues therein limited by statute, any person who is aggrieved by final agency action shall be…”
Lindemann v. Comm'n on Governmental Ethics & Election Practices, 2008 ME 187 (Me. 2008).
· cites it 6× “Section 11001(1) of MAPA sets forth the right to review agency action by providing: Except where a statute provides for direct review or review of a pro forma judicial decree by the Supreme Judicial Court or where judicial review is specifically precluded or the issues therein…”
Ne. Occupational Exch., Inc. v. Bureau of Rehab., 473 A.2d 406 (Me. 1984).
· cites it 7× “The plaintiff, Northeast Occupational Exchange (NOE), 1 argues that the Superior Court erred in ruling that the defendant Bureau of Rehabilitation’s (Bureau) decision to cease referring clients to NOE did not constitute “final agency action” pursuant to the Maine Administrative…”
Conservation Law Found., Inc. v. Dep't of Env't Prot., 2003 ME 62 (Me. 2003).
· cites it 3× “Johnson argues that CLF and the Gagnebins could have sought review of final agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 M.R.S.A. § 11001 (2002), or review of agency rule-making under that same Act, id.”
Nelson v. Bayroot, LLC, 953 A.2d 378 (Me. 2008).
· cites it 3× “§ 689 (2007), 5 M.R.S. § 11001(1) (2007), and MR. Civ. P.”
John Doe v. Maine Bd. of Osteopathic Licensure, 2020 ME 134 (Me. 2020).
· cites it 4× “With respect to the Board’s second argument, one could view Doe as not “aggrieved” as required to advance an APA claim under 5 M.R.S. § 11001(1) (2020) because, as discussed infra, he has alleged no prejudice caused by the Board’s actions.”
Guar. Fund Mgmt. Servs. v. Workers' Comp. Bd., 678 A.2d 578 (Me. 1996).
· cites it 5× “Imposition of a penalty under this section is deemed to be final agency action subject to appeal to the Superior Court, as provided in Title 5, chapter 375, subchapter VII [5 M.R.SA. § 11001, et seq.]. Notwithstanding Title 5, section 11004, execution of a penalty under this…”
E. Maine Med. Ctr. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 601 A.2d 99 (Me. 1992).
· cites it 5× “The Superi- or Court is granted specific jurisdiction to hear petitions for review of failure or refusal of agency to act by 5 M.R.S.A. § 11001 (1989). The statute provides: 2.”
Mallinckrodt LLC v. Littell, 616 F. Supp. 2d 128 (D. Me. 2009).
· cites it 3× “§ 1365(4); 5 M.R.S.A. § 11001(1). A decision of the Superior Court may be appealed to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court.”
Ullis v. Inhabitants of Town of Boothbay Harbor, 459 A.2d 153 (Me. 1983).
· cites it 3× “The plaintiff in the Superior Court was the Town of Boothbay Harbor, which sought review of a decision of the State Liquor Commission pursuant to 5 M.R.S.A. § 11001(1) (Supp. 1982-1988) and ,M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 11001(1) — 75 cases
Tomer v. Maine Human Rights Comm'n, 2008 ME 190 (Me. 2008).
“Except where a statute provides for direct review or review of a pro forma judicial decree by the Supreme Judicial Court or where judicial review is specifically precluded or the issues therein limited by statute, any person who is aggrieved by final agency action shall be…”
Ne. Occupational Exch., Inc. v. Bureau of Rehab., 473 A.2d 406 (Me. 1984).
“The plaintiff, Northeast Occupational Exchange (NOE), 1 argues that the Superior Court erred in ruling that the defendant Bureau of Rehabilitation’s (Bureau) decision to cease referring clients to NOE did not constitute “final agency action” pursuant to the Maine Administrative…”
Lindemann v. Comm'n on Governmental Ethics & Election Practices, 2008 ME 187 (Me. 2008).
“Section 11001(1) of MAPA sets forth the right to review agency action by providing: Except where a statute provides for direct review or review of a pro forma judicial decree by the Supreme Judicial Court or where judicial review is specifically precluded or the issues therein…”
Guar. Fund Mgmt. Servs. v. Workers' Comp. Bd., 678 A.2d 578 (Me. 1996).
“Imposition of a penalty under this section is deemed to be final agency action subject to appeal to the Superior Court, as provided in Title 5, chapter 375, subchapter VII [5 M.R.SA. § 11001, et seq.]. Notwithstanding Title 5, section 11004, execution of a penalty under this…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 11001(1)(2004) — 1 case
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 11001(1)(2022) — 1 case
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 11001(2) — 25 cases
Lindemann v. Comm'n on Governmental Ethics & Election Practices, 2008 ME 187 (Me. 2008).
“Section 11001(1) of MAPA sets forth the right to review agency action by providing: Except where a statute provides for direct review or review of a pro forma judicial decree by the Supreme Judicial Court or where judicial review is specifically precluded or the issues therein…”
John Doe v. Maine Bd. of Osteopathic Licensure, 2020 ME 134 (Me. 2020).
“With respect to the Board’s second argument, one could view Doe as not “aggrieved” as required to advance an APA claim under 5 M.R.S. § 11001(1) (2020) because, as discussed infra, he has alleged no prejudice caused by the Board’s actions.”
E. Maine Med. Ctr. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 601 A.2d 99 (Me. 1992).
“The Superi- or Court is granted specific jurisdiction to hear petitions for review of failure or refusal of agency to act by 5 M.R.S.A. § 11001 (1989). The statute provides: 2.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 11001(2)(2020) — 1 case
John Doe v. Maine Bd. of Osteopathic Licensure, 2020 ME 134 (Me. 2020).
“With respect to the Board’s second argument, one could view Doe as not “aggrieved” as required to advance an APA claim under 5 M.R.S. § 11001(1) (2020) because, as discussed infra, he has alleged no prejudice caused by the Board’s actions.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 11001(3) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.