Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 9-A
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 9-A, § 8-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1981, c. 243, §§25,26 (NEW). PL 1981, c. 551, §3 (AMD). PL 2011, c. 427, Pt. A, §14 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1991–2011 · leading case: Campbell v. MacHias Sav. Bank, 865 F. Supp. 26 (D. Me. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Campbell v. MacHias Sav. Bank, 865 F. Supp. 26 (D. Me. 1994). · cites it 2× “§§ 1601 -1667e, and 9-A M.R.S.A. §§ 8-101 to 8-404 (Supp.1994).”
Morris v. Resolution Trust Corp., 622 A.2d 708 (Me. 1993). “) on a jury verdict awarding Baychar Morris, a/k/a Baychar, compensatory and punitive damages in the total amount of $99,374 on her claims against American for the breach of a fiduciary duty and a violation of the Maine Consumer Credit Code — Truth-in-Lending (9-A M.R.S.A. §§…”
New Maine Nat'l Bank v. Gendron, 780 F. Supp. 52 (D. Me. 1991). “(1989), and the MCCC, 9-A M.R.S.A. § 8-101 etseq. Complaint, ¶¶ 6, 7, 9, 11 and 12.”
Doyle v. Household Credit Servs., Inc., 844 F. Supp. 13 (D. Me. 1994). “Count II alleges a violation of the Maine Consumer Credit Code, 9-A M.R.S.A. § 8-101 et seq. Count III alleges state common law claims of libel and slander based on actual malice and negligence.”
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Pelletier, 31 A.3d 1235 (Me. 2011). “§§ 1601 -1667f (Lexis-Nexis 2011) 1 and 9-A M.R.S. §§ 8-101 to 8-404 (2010), including the provisions of the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act of 1994 (HOEPA), 15 U.”
Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co. v. Pelletier, 2011 ME 110 (Me. 2011). “§§ 1601 -1667f (Lexis-Nexis 2011) [1] and 9-A M.R.S. §§ 8-101 to 8-404 (2010), including the provisions of the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act of 1994 (HOEPA), 15 U.”
Hamilton v. Bank of Am. Corp. (Me. Super. Ct 2009). “Violations of the Truth in Lending Act (9-A M.R.S. § 8-101) XXVII. Violations of the Fair Credit Billing Act (9-A M.”
Bordetsky v. Charron (Me. Super. Ct 2011). “§§ l601-1667f (LexisNexis 2005);2 2) the Maine Consumer Credit Code (the "Code,), 9-A M.R.S. §§ 8-101 to -403 (2006); 3 Before trial, the parties stipulated that, subject only to Charron's counterclaims and affirmative defenses, Bordetsky had met the requirements for his…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.