Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 9-B, § 163 (2026)

Subpoena, summons, warrant or court order

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1.  Service.  A financial institution authorized to do business in this State or credit union authorized to do business in this State shall disclose financial records under section 162 pursuant to a subpoena, summons, warrant or court order that on its face appears to have been issued upon lawful authority only if the subpoena, summons, warrant or court order is served upon the customer prior to disclosure by the financial institution or credit union. The agency or person requesting the disclosure of financial records shall certify in writing to the financial institution or credit union the fact that the subpoena, summons, warrant or court order has been served upon the customer. The court for good cause shown may delay or dispense with service of the subpoena, summons, warrant or court order upon the customer. The court shall delay or dispense with service of the subpoena, summons, warrant or court order upon the customer upon notice by the Attorney General, the Attorney General's designee or the District Attorney that service upon the customer would not be in the public interest. A subpoena, summons or warrant issued in connection with a criminal proceeding or state or federal grand jury proceeding, a request for information by the Department of Health and Human Services for purposes related to establishing, modifying or enforcing a child support order, a request for information by the Department of Administrative and Financial Services, Bureau of Revenue Services for purposes related to establishing, modifying or enforcing tax liabilities or a trustee process lawfully issued need not be served upon the customer.  
[PL 2009, c. 213, Pt. AAAA, §5 (AMD).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1977, c. 416 (NEW). PL 1985, c. 647, §2 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 16, §1 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 537, §2 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 537, §62 (AFF). PL 1999, c. 197, §1 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 262, §B5 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 689, §B6 (REV). PL 2009, c. 213, Pt. AAAA, §5 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1979–2012 · leading case: State v. Fredette, 411 A.2d 65 (Me. 1979).
State v. Fredette, 411 A.2d 65 (Me. 1979). · cites it 2× “[4] 9-B M.R.S.A. § 163 establishes the procedure by which financial records may be obtained by "subpoena, summons, warrant or court order" on a fiduciary institution.”
Cooperman v. One Bancorp, 134 F.R.D. 4 (D. Me. 1991). “9-B M.R.S.A. § 163. The statute contemplates that the records in question will be available pursuant to a lawful court order under appropriate conditions.”
U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. James, 264 F.R.D. 17 (D. Me. 2010). “9-B M.R.S.A. § 163. Counsel for the plaintiff has represented that he did so in this case.”
Porter v. Norway Sav. Bank (Me. Super. Ct 2011). “9-B M.R.S. § 163(1) (2006) (emphasis added).”
State of Maine v. Salisbury (Me. Super. Ct 2012). “9-B M.R.S. § 163 (2011). Additionally, the Law Court has noted that violation of section 163 does not lead to an exclusion of evidence: "Even if we assume that the State did not comply with § 163, we would be disinclined at this time to apply an exclusionary rule.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 9-B, § 163(1) — 1 case
Porter v. Norway Sav. Bank (Me. Super. Ct 2011). “9-B M.R.S. § 163(1) (2006) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.