Md. Code Ann. » Maryland Code / Correctional Services
Maryland Code

Md. Code Ann., Corr. Servs. § 2-101 (2026)

§ 2-101

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MD-GAmgaleg.maryland.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§2–101.

    There is a Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services established as a principal department of the State government.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2019–2025 · leading case: Pense v. Md. Dep't of Pub. Saf. & Corr. Servs., 926 F.3d 97 (4th Cir. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pense v. Md. Dep't of Pub. Saf. & Corr. Servs., 926 F.3d 97 (4th Cir. 2019). “" See Md. Code Ann., Corr. Servs. § 2-101 . The statutory consent to suit provision applicable to claims under the FEPA, see Md.”
Litchfield v. Rinehart (D. Maryland 2022). · cites it 2× “See Md. Code Ann., Corr. Servs. § 2-101 ; Clark v.”
Davis v. Fisher (D. Maryland 2020). “” Md. Code Ann., Corr. Servs. § 2-101 . Because DPSCS and MCTC are arms of the State of Maryland, the claims against them are barred by the Eleventh Amendment and must be dismissed.”
Elliott v. Maryland Corr. Training Ctr. (D. Maryland 2021). “See Md. Code Ann., Corr. Servs. § 2-101 . And HCC, which is controlled by the state of Maryland, is treated as a state entity.”
Andrews v. Maryland Dep't of Pub. Saf. & Corr. Servs. (D. Maryland 2024). “Plaintiffs seek monetary damages only for all Counts and therefore the second exception to sovereign immunity does not apply. See (ECF No. 2 at 29 ¶ 116, 33 ¶ 133, 34 ¶ 140, 35 ¶ 150).”
Anderson v. Dep't of Pub. Saf. & Corr. (D. Maryland 2024). “” Md. Code, Corr. Servs. § 2-101; Pense v. Maryland Dep't of Pub.”
Gilliam v. Dep't of Pub. Saf. & Corr. Servs. (D. Maryland 2024). “See Md. Code Ann., Corr. Servs. § 2-101 ; Clark v.”
Washington v. MD DPSCS agents & supervisory officials (D. Maryland 2025). “DPSCS To the extent Washington intended to name “MD DPSCS” as a Defendant, Defendants correctly argue that DPSCS, a state agency, Md. Code Ann., Corr. Servs. § 2-101 , and the individual Defendants, to the extent they are sued in their official capacities as state employees, are…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.