Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 103, § 28 (2026)

Exemption of vessels from compulsory pilotage

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 28. All coastwise vessels not sailing under register and not carrying oil, hazardous material or hazardous waste in bulk as cargo in or entering upon areas of special interest within the waters of the commonwealth, United States public vessels, and United States fishing vessels shall be exempt from compulsory pilotage; provided, however, that if any such vessel requests the aid of a pilot, he shall, when permitted by the laws of the United States, serve the same in like manner as vessels not exempt, and shall be entitled to regular compensation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1926–2007 · leading case: United States v. Massachusetts, 493 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2007).
United States v. Massachusetts, 493 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2007). “It is noteworthy that although the Coast Guard in its 2004 notice was clearly aware of the enactment of MOSPA, its federalism statement did not comment on the preemption of the tug escort provision, Mass.”
Commonwealth v. Kemp, 150 N.E. 172 (Mass. 1926). “By G. L. c. 103, § 28, “All coastwise steam vessels not sailing under register, .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.