Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 119, § 21A (2026)

Admissibility of evidence; qualified experts

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 21A. Evidence in proceedings under sections 21 to 51H, inclusive, shall be admissible according to the rules of the common law and the General Laws and may include reports to the court by any person who has made an investigation of the facts relating to the welfare of the child and is qualified as an expert according to the rules of the common law or by statute or is an agent of the department or of an approved charitable corporation or agency substantially engaged in the foster care or protection of children. Such person may file with the court in a proceeding under said sections 21 to 51H, inclusive, a full report of all facts obtained as a result of such investigation. The person reporting may be called as a witness by any party for examination as to the statements made in the report. Such examination shall be conducted as though it were on cross-examination. Evidence may include testimony of foster parents or pre-adoptive parents concerning the welfare of a child if such child has been in the care of the foster or pre-adoptive parents for 6 months or more, and may include the testimony of the child if the court determines that the child is competent and willing, after consultation with counsel, if any, to testify.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2009–2025 · leading case: Care & Prot. of Zita, 915 N.E.2d 1067 (Mass. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Care & Prot. of Zita, 915 N.E.2d 1067 (Mass. 2009). · cites it 2× “However characterized, we conclude that it was improper for the judge to consider the contents of that document in determining whether to extend temporary custody to the department until a full hearing on the merits.”
Care & Prot. of Doretta & Others., 101 Mass. App. Ct. 584 (Mass. App. Ct. 2022). “272, 280 (2009), quoting G. L. c. 119, § 21A. Specifically, "first- and second-level hearsay contained within DCF reports and official DCF records is admissible for statements of primary fact, so long as the hearsay source is specifically identified in the document and is…”
Adoption of Luc, 116 N.E.3d 644 (Mass. App. Ct. 2018). “2d 1067 (2009), quoting G. L. c. 119, § 21A. 3 "The *647 general admissibility of case work documents and court investigator reports is no longer seriously in question.”
In re Sadie, 123 N.E.3d 803 (Mass. App. Ct. 2019). “6 See G. L. c. 119, § 21A ; Adoption of Peggy , 436 Mass.”
Adoption of Nova. (Mass. App. Ct. 2025). “" Given the details of the mother's positive visits with the child contained in the court reports prepared by the department pursuant to G. L. c. 119, § 21A and submitted in evidence, we find the mother's 10 argument unpersuasive.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.