Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149, § 44I (2026)

Severability of Secs. 44A to 44H

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 44I. If any provision of sections forty-four A to forty-four H, inclusive, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional, the other provisions of said sections or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance other than that as to which it is held invalid or unconstitutional, shall not be affected thereby.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1959–1990 · leading case: Interstate Eng'g Corp. v. City of Fitchburg, 329 N.E.2d 128 (Mass. 1975).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Interstate Eng'g Corp. v. City of Fitchburg, 329 N.E.2d 128 (Mass. 1975). “604, § 5), and G.L.c. 149, § 44I (2) (as amended through St.”

PAUL SARDELLA CONSTR. v. Braintree Hous. Auth., 329 N.E.2d 762 (Mass. App. Ct. 1975). · cites it 2× “Mazza failed to execute the subcontracts within five days (G.L.c. 149, § 44I [3]) and returned the unexecuted contracts to Sardella on November 22, 1971, notifying Sardella and the Authority of its refusal to execute "due to a bona fide clerical error" in its bid.”

Findlen v. Winchendon Hous. Auth., 553 N.E.2d 554 (Mass. App. Ct. 1990). “(1) of G. L. c. 149, § 44I, inserted by St. 1956, c.”

Loranger v. Martha's Vineyard Reg'l High Sch. Dist., 155 N.E.2d 791 (Mass. 1959). “See G.L.c. 149, § 44I. [2] We do not propose to rule on the validity of the subbids of contractors who were not selected by either Loranger or Ayers and who have not asserted that they have been injured.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.