Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 191, § 15 (2026)

Filing of waiver; rights upon waiver

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 15. The surviving husband or wife of a deceased person, except as provided in section thirty-six of chapter two hundred and nine, within six months after the probate of the will of such deceased, may file in the registry of probate a writing signed by him or by her, waiving any provisions that may have been made in it for him or for her, or claiming such portion of the estate of the deceased as he or she is given the right to claim under this section, and if the deceased left issue, he or she shall thereupon take one third of the personal and one third of the real property; and if the deceased left kindred but no issue, he or she shall take twenty-five thousand dollars and one half of the remaining personal and one half of the remaining real property; except that in either case if he or she would thus take real and personal property to an amount exceeding twenty-five thousand dollars in value, he or she shall receive, in addition to that amount, only the income during his or her life of the excess of his or her share of such estate above that amount, the personal property to be held in trust and the real property vested in him or her for life, from the death of the deceased. If the deceased left no issue or kindred, the surviving husband or wife shall take twenty-five thousand dollars and one half of the remaining personal and one half of the remaining real property absolutely. If the real and personal property of the deceased which the surviving husband or wife takes under the foregoing provisions exceeds twenty-five thousand dollars in value, and the surviving husband or wife is to take only twenty-five thousand dollars absolutely, the twenty-five thousand dollars, above given absolutely shall be paid out of that part of the personal property in which the husband or wife is interested; and if such part is insufficient the deficiency shall, upon the petition of any person interested, be paid from the sale or mortgage in fee, in the manner provided for the payment of debts or legacies, of that part of the real property in which he or she is interested. Such sale or mortgage may be made either before or after such part is set off from the other real property of the deceased for the life of the husband or widow. If, after probate of such will, legal proceedings have been instituted wherein its validity or effect is drawn in question, the probate court may, within said six months, on petition and after such notice as it orders, extend the time for filing the aforesaid claim and waiver until the expiration of six months from the termination of such proceedings.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1922–2024 · leading case: Bongaards v. Millen, 793 N.E.2d 335 (Mass. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bongaards v. Millen, 793 N.E.2d 335 (Mass. 2003). · cites it 28× “The plaintiff filed a complaint in the Probate and Family Court, seeking a declaration that certain property held in trust by his deceased wife, Jean Bongaards (Jean), should be considered part of her estate for purposes of determining his elective share under G. L. c. 191, §…”
Ciani v. MacGrath, 114 N.E.3d 52 (Mass. 2019). · cites it 9× “At issue is the meaning of a particular provision of G. L. c. 191, § 15 ( § 15 ), the Commonwealth's elective share statute.”
Sullivan v. Burkin, 460 N.E.2d 572 (Mass. 1984). · cites it 9× “Sullivan, has exercised her right, under G. L. c. 191, § 15, to take a share of her husband’s estate.”
Bongaards v. Millen, 768 N.E.2d 1107 (Mass. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 9× “Following Jean’s death, George filed a complaint for declaratory judgment in the Probate and Family Court seeking a determination that real estate purportedly held in trust by her be treated as a part of her estate for purposes of his spousal claim under G. L. c. 191, § 15. 3…”
L.W.K. v. E.R.C., 432 Mass. 438 (Mass. 2000). · cites it 4× “532, 535 (1940) (testamentary dispositions subject to the “claims of creditors and to administration expenses”); G. L. c. 191, § 15, 16 (spousal elective share takes priority over testamentary dispositions).”
Goodridge v. Dep't of Pub. Health, 440 Mass. 309 (Mass. 2003). “208, § 34 (providing for payment of alimony and the equitable division of property on divorce); G. L. c. 191, § 15, and G. L. c. 189 (rights of elective share and dower).”
Attorney Gen. v. Desilets, 636 N.E.2d 233 (Mass. 1994). · cites it 2× “) (spouse's right to share of property not disposed of by will); G.L.c. 191, §§ 15, 16 (1992 ed.) (spouse's right to waiver of will and election of statutory share); G.”
State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Reiser, 389 N.E.2d 768 (Mass. App. Ct. 1979). “Traditionally the courts of this Commonwealth have always given full effect to inter vivos trusts, notwithstanding retention of powers to amend and revoke during life, even though this resulted in disinheritance of a spouse or children and nullified the policy which allows a…”
DuMont v. Godbey, 415 N.E.2d 188 (Mass. 1981). “G. L. c. 191, § 15. A judgment that the decedent had been deserted or was living apart for justifiable cause bars the claim of the surviving spouse to take against a will.”
Schulman v. Attorney Gen., 447 Mass. 189 (Mass. 2006). “559, 571 [1945], and held that it would treat assets of inter vivas trust as part of “estate of the deceased” under G. L. c. 191, § 15); Silverblatt v. Uvadas, 340 Mass.”
Rostanzo v. Rostanzo, 900 N.E.2d 101 (Mass. App. Ct. 2009). “It follows from our conclusion that by entering into the valid antenuptial agreement, the plaintiff waived any right that she might otherwise have had as the decedent’s widow pursuant to G.L. c. 191, § 15. c. Imposition of a constructive trust.”
Worcester Cnty. Nat'l Bank v. Comm'r of Corporations & Taxation, 175 N.E. 726 (Mass. 1931). “G. L. c. 191, § 15; see R. L. c. 135, § 16.”
Show all 26 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.