Section 2. The committee for public counsel services shall establish a definition of ''indigency'' for the purposes of this chapter and uniform standards and procedures for the determination by the courts of the commonwealth that: (1) a person is indigent and is unable to obtain counsel or (2) a person is indigent, but has the ability to pay a reduced fee for the appointment of counsel. The definition and standards, and any amendments thereto, shall be subject to the approval of the supreme judicial court and shall be used by the courts of the commonwealth in determining assignment of cases to the committee pursuant to section 5. In the formulation of the definition, standards and procedures, the committee shall utilize: (1) the reporting system operated by the commissioner of transitional assistance for the purpose of verifying financial eligibility of participants in state or federally funded programs; (2) the accessibility of income data available from the department of revenue; and (3) verifying material assets through the registry of motor vehicles.
Notes of Decisions
Commonwealth v. Porter, 971 N.E.2d 291 (Mass. 2012).
· cites it 3× “261, § 27B, and was interviewed by the probation department, see G. L. c. 211D, § 2 lh (a). 3 The defendant initially was appointed counsel on the mistaken belief that she received supplemental security income.”
Commonwealth v. Fico, 971 N.E.2d 275 (Mass. 2012).
· cites it 4× “G. L. c. 211D, § 2, inserted by St. 1983, c.”
Commonwealth v. Matranga, 914 N.E.2d 17 (Mass. 2009).
· cites it 2× “G. L. c. 211D, § 2. CPCS is authorized to contract with expert witnesses, G.”
Commonwealth v. Poissant, 823 N.E.2d 350 (Mass. 2005).
“If the person named in the petition is indigent under [G. L. c. 211D, § 2], the court shall, upon such person’s request, determine whether the expert or professional services are necessary and shall determine reasonable compensation for such services.”
Commonwealth v. Godwin, 804 N.E.2d 940 (Mass. App. Ct. 2004).
“” In turn, G. L. c. 211D, § 2, as inserted by St. 1983, c.”
Commonwealth v. Galazka, 997 N.E.2d 453 (Mass. App. Ct. 2013).
“1306 (1993), and qualifies for appointed counsel pursuant to G. L. c. 211D, § 2 lh (now § 2A, see St. 2011, c.”
Commonwealth v. Mortimer, 971 N.E.2d 283 (Mass. 2012).
“G. L. c. 211D, § 2. Supreme Judicial Court Rule 3:10 provides further definition to these categories.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.