Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 21G, § 7 (2026)

Issuance of permits; criteria and standards

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 7. The department shall, by regulation, specify, for each water source from which withdrawals are to be permitted, a date upon which its regulations establishing criteria, standards and procedures for issuing permits shall become effective. No person may, after the effective date thus specified, make a new withdrawal of more than the threshold volume of water from any water source, or construct any building or structure which may require that person to make such a new withdrawal of water unless such person obtains a permit in accordance with regulations adopted by the department.

In adopting regulations establishing criteria and standards for obtaining permits, the department shall assure, at a minimum, that the following factors are considered:—

(1) The impact of the proposed withdrawal on other water sources which are hydrologically interconnected with the water source from which the withdrawal is to be made;

(2) The anticipated times of year when withdrawals will be made;

(3) The water available within the safe yield of the water source from which the withdrawal is to be made;

(4) Reasonable protection of water uses, land values, investments and enterprises that are dependent on previously allowable withdrawals;

(5) The use to be made of the water proposed to be withdrawn and other existing, presently permitted or projected uses of the water source from which the withdrawal is to be made;

(6) Any water resources management plan for any city or town in which the affected water source is located;

(7) Any state water resources management plan adopted by the commission;

(8) Reasonable conservation practices and measures, consistent with efficient utilization of the water;

(9) Reasonable protection of public drinking water supplies, water quality, wastewater treatment capacity, waste assimilation capacity, groundwater recharge areas, navigation, hydropower resources, water-based recreation, wetland habitat, fish and wildlife, agriculture, and flood plains; and

(10) Reasonable economic development and the creation of jobs in the commonwealth.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2025 · leading case: In Re Water Use Permit Applications, 9 P.3d 409 (Haw. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Water Use Permit Applications, 9 P.3d 409 (Haw. 2000). “1999) (July 1, 1988 for agricultural uses); Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 21G, § 7 (West 1994) (effective date of the implementing regulations); Miss.”
Water Dep't of Fairhaven v. Dep't of Env't Prot., 920 N.E.2d 33 (Mass. 2010). “G. L. c. 21G, § 7 (“No person may, after the effective date thus specified, make a new withdrawal of more than the threshold volume of water from any water source .”
Brockton Power Co. LLC v. EFSB/City of Brockton v. EFSB (No. 2), 469 Mass. 215 (Mass. 2014). “Indeed, other than the DEP’s general mandate to consider environmental effects of water withdrawals under G. L. c. 21G, § 7, there is no evidence that the AGO specifically considers the environmental effects of the safe yield threshold.”
Springfield Water & Sewer Comm'n & Others v. Dep't of Env't Prot. & Another (Mass. App. Ct. 2025). · cites it 2× “See G. L. c. 21G, § 7. The department has broad discretion to issue or deny permits based on factors such as "the impact of the proposed withdrawal on other hydrologically interconnected water sources, the water available within the proposed water source's safe yield, and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.