Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 231, § 114 (2026)

Appeal from final judgment of single justice of supreme judicial court

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 114. A party aggrieved by a final judgment of a single justice of the supreme judicial court may appeal therefrom to the full court of the supreme judicial court.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 14 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1926–2026 · leading case: McMenimen v. Passatempo, 892 N.E.2d 287 (Mass. 2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

McMenimen v. Passatempo, 892 N.E.2d 287 (Mass. 2008). “G. L. c. 231, § 114 (“A party aggrieved by a final judgment of a single justice of [this] court may appeal therefrom to the full court .”

Commonwealth v. McCulloch, 879 N.E.2d 685 (Mass. 2008). “The Commonwealth then appealed to the full court pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 114. General Laws c. 211, § 3, confers on this court the power of “general superintendence of all courts of inferior jurisdiction to correct and prevent errors and abuses therein if no other remedy is…”

Olmstead v. Dep't of Telecomm. & Cable, 999 N.E.2d 125 (Mass. 2013). “The plaintiff appealed to the full court, pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 114. The department’s regulations require that it provide notice that an appeal from a final order or decision is governed by G.”

Bartlett v. Greyhound Real Est. Fin. Co., 669 N.E.2d 792 (Mass. App. Ct. 1996). “211, § 4A, and whose judgments would be subject to still further appeal under G. L. c. 231, § 114. . . . [I]t would hardly serve the purpose for which this court was created for us to throw the orders entered by our single justices under G.”

In re the Receivership of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc., 746 N.E.2d 513 (Mass. 2001). “Health Care properly does not dispute the appellees’ claim that it is not a “party aggrieved” within the meaning of G. L. c. 231, § 114, and has no standing to appeal.”

Katz v. Savitsky, 413 N.E.2d 354 (Mass. App. Ct. 1980). “231, § 6G, would lead to a practice under which persistent counsel would take those orders by complaints in the nature of certiorari (G. L. c.”

Russell v. Foley, 179 N.E. 619 (Mass. 1932). “212, now G. L. c. 231, § 114), which discloses a purpose to render judgments entered in accordance therewith different in kind from other judgments.”

Plymouth & Brockton Street Ry. Co. v. Leyland, 664 N.E.2d 17 (Mass. 1996). “The appeal is of right under G. L. c. 231, § 114 (1994. ed.), and having come this far we cannot say that this appeal itself and alone constitutes the type of egregious activity contemplated by our sanction power.”

Sogomonian v. C. F. Hovey Co., 254 Mass. 551 (Mass. 1926). “It is not questioned that in other respects there was compliance with the provisions of Eule 6 of Eules for the Eegulation of Practice before the Full Court.”

Cobb v. Supreme Jud. Court of Massachusetts, 334 F. Supp. 2d 50 (D. Mass. 2004). “G.L. c. 231, § 114; In re Foley, 439 Mass.”

Petition of the Dist. Attorney for the N. Dist., 502 N.E.2d 511 (Mass. 1987). “) are of the opinion that the appeal is properly here (G. L. c. 231, §114 [1984 ed.]) and, in any event, the substantive issues should be addressed by the court pursuant to this court’s powers of general superintendency.”

Herbert v. G. E. Lothrop Theatres Co., 173 N.E. 539 (Mass. 1930). “Said Rule 53 was passed pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 114, first enacted as St.”

Show all 14 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.