Mass. Gen. Laws » Part I Title III Chapter 30
Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 30, § 62A (2026)

Notice of intent to apply; forms; certification of need for environmental impact report; application of section

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 62A. A person applying or intending to apply to an agency for a permit or for financial assistance for a project may, at any time prior to, but, in any event, shall no later than ten days after filing the first application for such permit or assistance notify the secretary of environmental affairs of the nature of the project and of such application, if any, on such forms as said secretary shall prescribe and shall transmit copies of said notification forms to such agency from which a permit or financial assistance is or may be sought. Any agency proposing a project may file said notification forms prior to the development of the project and shall file said forms no later than the secretary of environmental affairs shall by regulation prescribe. Within thirty days after issuance of notice of the receipt of such notification, the secretary shall consult with the person or agency proposing the project and the agency, if any, from which a permit or financial assistance is or may be sought and shall issue a certificate stating whether an environmental impact report is required. If a report is required, the secretary with the cooperation of said person and agency shall, within the above mentioned thirty day period, limit the scope of the report to those issues which by the nature and location of the project are likely to cause damage to the environment. The secretary shall determine the form, content, level of detail and alternatives required for the report. In the case of a permit application to an agency from a private person for a project for which financial assistance is not sought the scope of said report and alternatives considered therein shall be limited to that part of the project which is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the permit. Any finding required by section sixty-one shall be limited to those matters which are within the scope of the environmental impact report, if any, required by this section.

In the case of a major and complicated project, the secretary of environmental affairs, with the agreement of the agencies and persons who are proposing, providing public financial assistance for or issuing permits for a project subject to sections sixty-two to sixty-two H, inclusive, may establish a specific procedure for evaluation and review of the environmental impacts of said project. This section and sections 62B to 62L, inclusive, shall not apply to the energy facilities siting board established under section 69H of chapter 164 or to any proponent or owner of a large clean energy infrastructure facility, as defined in section 69G of said chapter 164, or small clean energy infrastructure facility, as defined in section 21 of chapter 25A, in relation to an application for a consolidated permit or petition for a de novo adjudication filed under sections 69T to 69W, inclusive, of said chapter 164.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases, 1981–2014 · leading case: Allen v. Boston Redevelopment Auth., 450 Mass. 242 (Mass. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Allen v. Boston Redevelopment Auth., 450 Mass. 242 (Mass. 2007). · cites it 8× “See G. L. c. 30, § 62A; 301 Code Mass. Regs. § 11.”
Cummings v. Sec'y of Env't Affairs, 524 N.E.2d 836 (Mass. 1988). · cites it 10× “21A, and who, under G.L.c. 30, § 62A, determines whether an EIR is required, may be guilty of a violation of MEPA by determining that no EIR is necessary.”
Villages Dev. Co. v. Sec'y of Exec. Off. of Env't Affairs, 571 N.E.2d 361 (Mass. 1991). · cites it 6× “G. L. c. 30, § 62A. The Secretary reviews the ENF and consults with all interested parties to determine whether a comprehensive EIR is required.”
Town of Canton v. Comm'r of Massachusetts High. Dep't, 919 N.E.2d 1278 (Mass. 2010). · cites it 2× “G. L. c. 30, § 62A. This begins the MEPA process, and agencies 4 are prohibited from granting permits until that process is completed.”
Boston Pres. All., Inc. v. Sec'y of Env't Affairs, 396 Mass. 489 (Mass. 1986). · cites it 3× “Pursuant to G. L. c. 30, § 62A, FHSA submitted to the Secretary on May 15,1984, an environmental notification form.”
Enos v. Sec'y of Env't Affairs, 432 Mass. 132 (Mass. 2000). “G. L. c. 30, § 62A. After a thirty-day review period, during which the Secretary consults with the agency and other interested parties, the Secretary issues a written certificate stating whether an environmental impact report (EIR) is required and, if so, the form, scope,…”
Sierra Club v. Comm'r of the Dep't of Env't Mgmt., 439 Mass. 738 (Mass. 2003). “G. L. c. 30, §§ 62A, 62H. Nonetheless, as is often the case, the MEPA submissions here included a variety of statements by the proponent as to its perceived need for the project.”
Town of Walpole v. Sec'y of the Exec. Off. of Env't Affairs, 537 N.E.2d 1244 (Mass. 1989). “The secretary also issued a certificate *69 pursuant to G. L. c. 30, § 62A, and 301 Code Mass. Regs.”
Communities Against Runway Expansion, Inc. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 355 F.3d 678 (D.C. Cir. 2004). “See Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 30, §§ 62A, 62B. B. Factual Background Logan International Airport is owned and operated by the Massachusetts Port Authority (“Massport”), a Massachusetts state agency for MEPA purposes.”
Ten Persons of the Commonwealth v. Fellsway Dev. LLC, 460 Mass. 366 (Mass. 2011). “100, 102 (1991), citing G. L. c. 30, § 62A. The Secretary reviews the ENF and then “issues a written certificate stating whether an [EIR] is required.”
Wolbach v. Beckett, 480 N.E.2d 49 (Mass. App. Ct. 1985). “We note, however, that in that case the defect in the proceedings was that the applicant had failed to file an environmental impact report, see G. L. c. 30, § 62A; nonetheless, there was a full public hearing on the application, after which the commission issued its decision.”
Rando v. Town of North Attleborough, 692 N.E.2d 544 (Mass. App. Ct. 1998). “See G. L. c. 30, § 62A. The report, which included a traffic study, was also circulated to the town planning board.”
Show all 23 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.