Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 56, § 11 (2026)

Wilful alteration, mutilation, or destruction of nomination papers, etc.; subscribing to false statements

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 11. Whoever falsely makes or wilfully alters, defaces, mutilates, destroys or suppresses a certificate of nomination or nomination paper, or letter of withdrawal of a name from such paper, or an initiative petition or a petition for the submission of a question to the voters, or unlawfully signs any such certificate, paper, letter or petition, or files any such certificate, paper, letter or petition, knowing the same to be falsely made or altered, shall be punished by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars or by imprisonment for not more than one year.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1987–1999 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Katsirubis, 696 N.E.2d 147 (Mass. App. Ct. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Commonwealth v. Katsirubis, 696 N.E.2d 147 (Mass. App. Ct. 1998). · cites it 7× “As for the offense under G. L. c. 56, § 11, involving the filing of false certificates, the judge saw fit to impose a fine of $12,000 ($1,000 for each of the twelve counts).”
Commonwealth v. Romero, 514 N.E.2d 1333 (Mass. App. Ct. 1987). “See G. L. c. 56, § 11, and G. L. c. 268, § 1A.”
Walsh v. Sec'y of the Commonwealth, 430 Mass. 103 (Mass. 1999). “G. L. c. 56, § 11. The plaintiffs also suggest that, under the dictates of Hurst , a petition drive could only be conducted by professionals or a large organization.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.