Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 178L (2026)

Classification of sex offenders by board; hearings; right to counsel; reclassification

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 178L. (1) Upon review of any information useful in assessing the risk of reoffense and the degree of dangerousness posed to the public by the sex offender, including materials described in the board guidelines and any materials submitted by the sex offender, the board shall prepare a recommended classification of each offender. Such recommendation may be made by board staff members upon written approval by one board member; provided, however, that if the sex offender was a juvenile at the time of the offense, written approval must be given by a board member who is a licensed psychologist or psychiatrist with special expertise in the assessment and evaluation of juvenile sex offenders.

(a) Not less than 60 days prior to the release or parole of a sex offender from custody or incarceration, the board shall notify the sex offender of his right to submit to the board documentary evidence relative to his risk of reoffense and the degree of dangerousness posed to the public and his duty to register according to the provisions of section 178E. If the sex offender is a juvenile at the time of such notification, notification shall also be mailed to the sex offender's legal guardian or agency having custody of the juvenile in the absence of a legal guardian and his most recent attorney of record. Such sex offender may submit such evidence to the board within 30 days of receiving such notice from the board. Upon a reasonable showing, the board may extend the time in which such sex offender may submit such documentary evidence. Upon reviewing such evidence, the board shall promptly notify the sex offender of the board's recommended sex offender classification, his duty to register, if any, his right to petition the board to request an evidentiary hearing to challenge such classification and duty, his right to retain counsel to represent him at such hearing and his right to have counsel appointed for him if he is found to be indigent as determined by the board using the standards under chapter 211D; provided, however, that such indigent offender may also apply for and the board may grant payment of fees for an expert witness in any case where the board in its classification proceeding intends to rely on the testimony or report of an expert witness prepared specifically for the purposes of the classification proceeding. Such sex offender shall petition the board for such hearing within 20 days of receiving such notice. The board shall conduct such hearing in a reasonable time according to the provisions of subsection (2). The failure timely to petition the board for such hearing shall result in a waiver of such right and the registration requirements, if any, and the board's recommended classification shall become final.

(b) The district attorney for the county where such sex offender was prosecuted may, within ten days of a conviction or adjudication of a sexually violent offense, file a motion with the board to make an expedited recommended classification upon a showing that such sex offender poses a grave risk of imminent reoffense. If the petition is granted, the board shall make such recommendation within ten days of the expiration of the time to submit documentary evidence. If the petition is not granted, the board shall make such recommended classification as otherwise provided in this section.

(c) In the case of any sex offender not in custody, upon receiving registration data from the agency, the police department at which the sex offender registered, the sentencing court or by any other means, the board shall promptly notify the sex offender of his right to submit to the board documentary evidence relative to his risk of reoffense and the degree of dangerousness posed to the public and his duty to register, if any, according to section 178E. If such sex offender is a juvenile at the time of such notification, notification shall also be mailed to such sex offender's legal guardian or agency having custody of the juvenile in the absence of a legal guardian and his most recent attorney of record. Such sex offender may submit such evidence to the board within 30 days of receiving such notice from the board. Upon a reasonable showing, the board may extend the time in which a sex offender may submit such documentary evidence. Upon reviewing such evidence, the board shall promptly notify such sex offender of the board's recommended sex offender classification, his duty to register, if any, and his right to petition the board to request an evidentiary hearing to challenge such classification and duty, his right to retain counsel to represent him at such hearing and his right to have counsel appointed for him if he is found to be indigent as determined by the board using the standards under chapter 211D; provided, however, that such indigent offender may also apply for and the board may grant payment of fees for an expert witness in any case where the board in its classification proceeding intends to rely on the testimony or report of an expert witness prepared specifically for the purposes of the classification proceeding. Such sex offender shall petition the board for such hearing within 20 days of receiving such notice. The board shall conduct such hearing in a reasonable time according to the provisions of subsection (2). The failure timely to petition the board for such hearing shall result in a waiver of such right and the registration requirements, if any, and the board's recommended classification shall become final.

(2) If an offender requests a hearing in accordance with subsection (1), the chair may appoint a member, a panel of three board members or a hearing officer to conduct the hearing, according to the standard rules of adjudicatory procedure or other rules which the board may promulgate, and to determine by a preponderance of evidence such sex offender's duty to register and final classification. The board shall inform offenders requesting a hearing under the provisions of subsection (1) of their right to have counsel appointed if a sex offender is deemed to be indigent as determined by the board using the standards under chapter 211D. If the sex offender does not so request a hearing, the recommended classification and determination of duty to register shall become the board's final classification and determination and shall not be subject to judicial review. All offenders who are juveniles at the time of notification shall be represented by counsel at the hearing.

(3) The board may, on its own initiative or upon written request by a police department or district attorney, seek to reclassify any registered and finally classified sex offender in the event that new information, which is relevant to a determination of a risk of re-offense or degree of dangerousness, is received. The board shall promulgate regulations defining such new information and establishing the procedures relative to a reclassification hearing held for this purpose; provided that (i) the hearing is conducted according to the standard rules of adjudicatory procedure or other rules which the board may promulgate, (ii) the hearing is conducted in a reasonable time, and (iii) the sex offender is provided prompt notice of the hearing, which includes: the new information that led the board to seek reclassification of the offender, the offender's right to challenge the reclassification, the offender's right to submit to the board documentary evidence relative to his risk of reoffense and the degree of dangerousness posed to the public, the offender's right to retain counsel for the hearing, and the offender's right to have counsel appointed if the offender is indigent, as determined by the board using the standards in chapter 211D. An indigent offender may also apply for and the board may grant payment of fees for an expert witness in any case in which the board intends to rely on the testimony or report of an expert witness prepared specifically for the purposes of the reclassification proceeding. The failure of the offender to attend the hearing may result in a waiver of the offender's rights and the board's recommended reclassification becoming final.

All offenders who are juveniles at the time of notification shall be represented by counsel at the hearing and notification shall also be mailed to the sex offender's legal guardian or agency having custody of the juvenile in the absence of a legal guardian and the offender's most recent attorney of record.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 71 cases (15 in the last 5 years), 2001–2026 · leading case: Noe, SORB No. 5340 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 102 N.E.3d 409 (Mass. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Noe, SORB No. 5340 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 102 N.E.3d 409 (Mass. 2018). · cites it 19× “We also conclude that, given the plain language of G. L. c. 6, § 178L (3), indigent sex offenders have a right to counsel in such reclassification hearings.”
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 897 N.E.2d 1001 (Mass. 2008). · cites it 8× “Before the board, Doe filed a motion for funds to retain an expert witness under G. L. c. 6, § 178L (1), part of the sex offender registration law, G.”
Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 3974 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 927 N.E.2d 455 (Mass. 2010). · cites it 7× “The plaintiff was entitled to rebut these facts, G. L. c. 6, § 178L (1) (a), but he opted to offer no evidence of his own.”
Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 10216 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 857 N.E.2d 492 (Mass. 2006). · cites it 5× “G. L. c. 6, § 178L (1). On September 23, 2002, the board notified the plaintiff of its recommendation that he be classified as a level three sex offender.”
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 999 N.E.2d 478 (Mass. 2013). · cites it 5× “Doe timely requested a hearing to challenge that recommendation, pursuant to G. L. c. 6, § 178L (1) (a). She submitted several prehearing motions addressing the applicability of SORB’s guidelines to female sex offenders.”
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 882 N.E.2d 298 (Mass. 2008). · cites it 4× “See G. L. c. 6, § 178L (1); 803 Code Mass. Regs.”
Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 1211 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 857 N.E.2d 473 (Mass. 2006). · cites it 4× “See G. L. c. 6, § 178L. A Superior Court judge reviewed the administrative record pursuant to G.”
John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 126 N.E.3d 939 (Mass. 2019). · cites it 2× “See G. L. c. 6, § 178L (1). Where a sex offender challenges SORB's recommended classification, he or she is entitled to request an evidentiary hearing.”
Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 68549 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 470 Mass. 102 (Mass. 2014). · cites it 3× “This list is not exhaustive, however, and SORB also must take into account any other information that is “useful in assessing the risk of reoffense and the degree of dangerousness posed to the public by the sex offender,” including information of this kind introduced by the…”
Doe, SORB No. 76819 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 102 N.E.3d 950 (Mass. 2018). · cites it 6× “A sex offender is classified as level three where "the board determines that the risk of reoffense is high and the degree of dangerousness posed to the public is such that a substantial public safety interest is served by active dissemination" of registration information.”
Commonwealth v. Hammond, 78 N.E.3d 1128 (Mass. 2017). · cites it 4× “G. L. c. 6, § 178L (2). At this hearing, SORB has the burden to prove the appropriateness of its classification by clear and convincing evidence.”
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 130 N.E.3d 778 (Mass. 2019). · cites it 2× “See G. L. c. 6, § 178L (1). Before a classification is made final, an individual has the opportunity to request an evidentiary hearing before a hearing examiner.”
Show all 71 citing cases →
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 178L(1) — 5 cases
Smith v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 844 N.E.2d 680 (Mass. App. Ct. 2006).
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 966 N.E.2d 826 (Mass. App. Ct. 2012).
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 945 N.E.2d 935 (Mass. App. Ct. 2011).
Doe No. 10977 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 301 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2009).
Doe 29701 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 29 Mass. L. Rptr. 591 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2012).
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 178L(1)(2) — 1 case
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 14 Mass. L. Rptr. 111 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2001).
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 178L(1)(a) — 2 cases
Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 291554 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 27 N.E.3d 418 (Mass. App. Ct. 2015).
Doe, SORB No. 203108 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 29 N.E.3d 869 (Mass. App. Ct. 2015).
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 178L(1)(c) — 1 case
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 14 Mass. L. Rptr. 111 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2001).
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 178L(2) — 7 cases
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 966 N.E.2d 826 (Mass. App. Ct. 2012).
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 948 N.E.2d 1268 (Mass. App. Ct. 2011).
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 971 N.E.2d 800 (Mass. App. Ct. 2012).
Doe No. 16297 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 21 Mass. L. Rptr. 481 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2006).
Noe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 34 Mass. L. Rptr. 127 (Suffolk Mass. Super. Ct. 2017).
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 178L(3) — 2 cases
Noe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 34 Mass. L. Rptr. 127 (Suffolk Mass. Super. Ct. 2017).
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 32 Mass. L. Rptr. 365 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2014).
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 178L(c) — 1 case
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 24 Mass. L. Rptr. 25 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2008).
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 178L(l)(a) — 5 cases
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 948 N.E.2d 1268 (Mass. App. Ct. 2011).
Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 291554 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 27 N.E.3d 418 (Mass. App. Ct. 2015).
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 970 N.E.2d 345 (Mass. App. Ct. 2012).
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 959 N.E.2d 990 (Mass. App. Ct. 2012).
Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 95318 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 951 N.E.2d 727 (Mass. App. Ct. 2011).
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 178L(l)(c) — 9 cases
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 966 N.E.2d 826 (Mass. App. Ct. 2012).
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 970 N.E.2d 345 (Mass. App. Ct. 2012).
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 998 N.E.2d 793 (Mass. App. Ct. 2013).
Doe No. 16297 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 21 Mass. L. Rptr. 481 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2006).
Colson v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 23 Mass. L. Rptr. 639 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2008).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.