Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.1001 (2026)

Repealed. 1976, Act 419, Eff. July 12, 1978.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TRAILER COACH PARKS

Act 243 of 1959

125.1001 Repealed. 1976, Act 419, Eff. July 12, 1978.

Repealed. 1976, Act 419, Eff. July 12, 1978.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 11 cases, 1960–1999 · leading case: Sandy Pines Wilderness Trails, Inc v. Salem Twp., 591 N.W.2d 658 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Sandy Pines Wilderness Trails, Inc v. Salem Twp., 591 N.W.2d 658 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “3 1959 PA 243 , MCL 125.1001 et seq.; MSA 5.278(31) et seq.”

Dequindre Dev. Co. v. Charter Twp. of Warren, 103 N.W.2d 600 (Mich. 1960). “, as amended), repealed by PA 1959, No 243 (CL 1948, § 125.1001 et seq. [Stat Ann 1959 Cum Supp § 5.”

Palmer v. Twp. of Superior, 233 N.W.2d 14 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975). “II Plaintiffs’ second challenge to defendant’s ordinance is their claim that article X-D of the ordinance, which regulates the establishment and operation of trailer parks, is void because it conflicts with the terms of the state Mobile Home Park Act, 1959 PA 243 ; MCLA 125.1001…”

King Arthur's Court v. Badgley, 209 N.W.2d 488 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 2× “Nevertheless, this Court held that both the Michigan Trailer Coach Park Act, MCLA 125.1001 et seq.; MSA 5.278(31) et seq.”

Moorman v. State Health Comm'r, 140 N.W.2d 554 (Mich. Ct. App. 1966). · cites it 2× “2 PA 1959, No 243, as last amended by PA 1963, No 161 (see-CLS 1961, § 125.1001 et seq. [Stat Ann 1961 Bev and Stat Ann 1963' Cum Supp § 5.”

Sabo v. Monroe Twp., 208 N.W.2d 57 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 4× “[3] MCLA 125.1001 et seq.; MSA 5.278(31) et seq.”

Artman v. Coll. Heights Mobile Park, Inc., 173 N.W.2d 833 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 2× “It is plaintiff’s basic contention that he, as an asphalt paving company, working on a trailer park, is not subject to the residential builders’ act.”

Anderson v. Twp. of Highland, 174 N.W.2d 909 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 2× “” Our state legislature, through the enactment of the Trailer Coach Park Act of 1959, PA 1959, No 243, MCLA § 125.1001 et seq. (Stat Ann 1961 Rev § 5.”

Courtland Twp. v. Cole, 239 N.W.2d 630 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976). “1801], is not entitled to treatment as a trailer coach under the provisions of the trailer coach park act [MCLA 125.1001 et seqMSA 5.278(31)]”. 1 Because it is anticipated that mobile homes may be rendered immobile, many ordinances have not restricted their definitions of mobile…”

Fye v. Bouma, 197 N.W.2d 114 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972). “*671 The Trailer Coach Park Act, 1959 PA 243 , MCLA 125.1001 et seq.; MSA 5.278(31) et seq.”

Mulias v. City of Trenton, 188 N.W.2d 37 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971). · cites it 2× “MCLA § 125.1001 et seq. (Stat Ann 1961 Rev § 5.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.