Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.1001
Repealed. 1976, Act 419, Eff. July 12, 1978.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TRAILER COACH PARKS
Act 243 of 1959
125.1001 Repealed. 1976, Act 419, Eff. July 12, 1978.
Repealed. 1976, Act 419, Eff. July 12, 1978.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1960–1999 · leading case: Sandy Pines Wilderness Trails, Inc v. Salem Township
Sandy Pines Wilderness Trails, Inc v. Salem Township (1999)
“3 1959 PA 243 , MCL 125.1001 et seq.; MSA 5.278(31) et seq.”
Dequindre Development Co. v. Charter Township of Warren (1960)
“, as amended), repealed by PA 1959, No 243 (CL 1948, § 125.1001 et seq. [Stat Ann 1959 Cum Supp § 5.”
Palmer v. Township of Superior (1975)
“II Plaintiffs’ second challenge to defendant’s ordinance is their claim that article X-D of the ordinance, which regulates the establishment and operation of trailer parks, is void because it conflicts with the terms of the state Mobile Home Park Act, 1959 PA 243 ; MCLA 125.1001…”
King Arthur's Court v. Badgley (1973)
“Nevertheless, this Court held that both the Michigan Trailer Coach Park Act, MCLA 125.1001 et seq.; MSA 5.278(31) et seq.”
Moorman v. State Health Commissioner (1966)
“2 PA 1959, No 243, as last amended by PA 1963, No 161 (see-CLS 1961, § 125.1001 et seq. [Stat Ann 1961 Bev and Stat Ann 1963' Cum Supp § 5.”
Sabo v. Monroe Township (1973)
“[3] MCLA 125.1001 et seq.; MSA 5.278(31) et seq.”
Artman v. College Heights Mobile Park, Inc. (1969)
“It is plaintiff’s basic contention that he, as an asphalt paving company, working on a trailer park, is not subject to the residential builders’ act.”
Anderson v. Township of Highland (1969)
“” Our state legislature, through the enactment of the Trailer Coach Park Act of 1959, PA 1959, No 243, MCLA § 125.1001 et seq. (Stat Ann 1961 Rev § 5.”
Courtland Township v. Cole (1976)
“1801], is not entitled to treatment as a trailer coach under the provisions of the trailer coach park act [MCLA 125.1001 et seqMSA 5.278(31)]”. 1 Because it is anticipated that mobile homes may be rendered immobile, many ordinances have not restricted their definitions of mobile…”
Fye v. Bouma (1972)
“*671 The Trailer Coach Park Act, 1959 PA 243 , MCLA 125.1001 et seq.; MSA 5.278(31) et seq.”
Mulias v. City of Trenton (1971)
“MCLA § 125.1001 et seq. (Stat Ann 1961 Rev § 5.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.