Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.1502 (2026)
Repealed. 1999, Act 245, Eff. July 31, 2001.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
STILLE-DEROSSETT-HALE SINGLE STATE CONSTRUCTION CODE ACT
Act 230 of 1972
125.1502 Repealed. 1999, Act 245, Eff. July 31, 2001.
Repealed. 1999, Act 245, Eff. July 31, 2001.
Compiler's Notes:
The repealed section pertained to definitions and references to act and code.
PopularName Notes:
Act 230PopularName Notes:
Uniform Construction CodeNotes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1973–2003 · leading case: Gackler Land Co. v. Yankee Springs Twp., 398 N.W.2d 393 (Mich. 1986).
Gackler Land Co. v. Yankee Springs Twp., 398 N.W.2d 393 (Mich. 1986). “Further, MCL 125.1502(m); MSA 5.2949(2)(m) specifically excludes from the definition of "construction regulation" under the code "a zoning ordinance or rule issued pursuant to a zoning ordinance and related to zoning.”
Frericks v. Highland Twp., 579 N.W.2d 441 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “2949[24]), “construction regulations” adopted by a governmental subdivision are “repealed and invalid” except as provided for in MCL 125.”
Ali v. City of Detroit, 554 N.W.2d 384 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996). “We also decline plaintiffs’ invitation to adopt the definition of “building” contained in the State Construction Code Act, MCL 125.1502(l)(f); MSA 5.2949(2)(l)(f). That definition is broad enough to encompass the structure found not to be a building in Freedman, supra.”
City of Troy v. Papadelis, 572 N.W.2d 246 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “(rtfa); that the cold frames and shade covers used to protect plants on defendants’ property were permitted temporary structures under both the State Construction Code, MCL 125.1502(2); MSA 5.2949(2)(2) and the Right to Farm Act; and that plaintiff was barred by laches from…”
Key v. Twp. of Paw Paw, 657 N.W.2d 546 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “Under a subsection of the state construction code, MCL 125.1502(l)(h), “business day” is defined as “a day of the year, exclusive of a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.”
Lockwood v. City of Southfield, 286 N.W.2d 87 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). “Plaintiffs argue that the only effect of the regulation is to restrict the use of a portion of the building, and is more properly labeled a construction regulation falling within the State Construction Code Act, MCL 125.1502(l)(k); MSA 5.2949(2)(l)(k). Plaintiffs further argue…”
Lanphear v. Antwerp Twp., 214 N.W.2d 66 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973). “Other provisions dealing with mobile homes in the new act are MCLA 125.1502 to 125.1519; MSA 5.2949(2) to 5.”
Moore v. City of Detroit, 382 N.W.2d 482 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “MCL 125.1502(1)(l); MSA 5.2949(2)(1)(l). The state construction code is applicable to all governmental subdivisions of this state unless a subdivision exempts itself by adopting and enforcing another nationally recognized building code or model building code.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.1502(1)(l) — 1 case
Moore v. City of Detroit, 382 N.W.2d 482 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “MCL 125.1502(1)(l); MSA 5.2949(2)(1)(l). The state construction code is applicable to all governmental subdivisions of this state unless a subdivision exempts itself by adopting and enforcing another nationally recognized building code or model building code.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.1502(2) — 1 case
City of Troy v. Papadelis, 572 N.W.2d 246 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “(rtfa); that the cold frames and shade covers used to protect plants on defendants’ property were permitted temporary structures under both the State Construction Code, MCL 125.1502(2); MSA 5.2949(2)(2) and the Right to Farm Act; and that plaintiff was barred by laches from…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.1502(l)(f) — 1 case
Ali v. City of Detroit, 554 N.W.2d 384 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996). “We also decline plaintiffs’ invitation to adopt the definition of “building” contained in the State Construction Code Act, MCL 125.1502(l)(f); MSA 5.2949(2)(l)(f). That definition is broad enough to encompass the structure found not to be a building in Freedman, supra.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.1502(l)(h) — 1 case
Key v. Twp. of Paw Paw, 657 N.W.2d 546 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “Under a subsection of the state construction code, MCL 125.1502(l)(h), “business day” is defined as “a day of the year, exclusive of a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.1502(l)(k) — 1 case
Lockwood v. City of Southfield, 286 N.W.2d 87 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). “Plaintiffs argue that the only effect of the regulation is to restrict the use of a portion of the building, and is more properly labeled a construction regulation falling within the State Construction Code Act, MCL 125.1502(l)(k); MSA 5.2949(2)(l)(k). Plaintiffs further argue…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.1502(m) — 2 cases
Gackler Land Co. v. Yankee Springs Twp., 398 N.W.2d 393 (Mich. 1986). “Further, MCL 125.1502(m); MSA 5.2949(2)(m) specifically excludes from the definition of "construction regulation" under the code "a zoning ordinance or rule issued pursuant to a zoning ordinance and related to zoning.”
Frericks v. Highland Twp., 579 N.W.2d 441 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “2949[24]), “construction regulations” adopted by a governmental subdivision are “repealed and invalid” except as provided for in MCL 125.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.