Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 14 / R.S. of 1846
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 14.30 (2026)

Supervision of prosecutors; report to legislature.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Revised Statutes of 1846


R.S. of 1846


14.30 Supervision of prosecutors; report to legislature.

Sec. 30.

    The attorney general shall supervise the work of, consult and advise the prosecuting attorneys, in all matters pertaining to the duties of their offices; and he shall make and submit to the legislature, at the commencement of its session, a report of all official business done by him during the 2 years preceding, specifying the suits to which he has attended, the number of persons prosecuted, the crimes for which, and the counties where such prosecutions were had, the results thereof, and the punishments awarded.

History: R.S. 1846, Ch. 12 ;-- CL 1857, 182 ;-- CL 1871, 257 ;-- How. 288 ;-- CL 1897, 106 ;-- CL 1915, 134 ;-- Am. 1921, Act 394, Eff. Aug. 18, 1921 ;-- CL 1929, 178 ;-- CL 1948, 14.30

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1972–2021 · leading case: Local 567 Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty., & Mun. Employees v. Michigan Council 25, Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty., & Mun. Employees, 635 F. Supp. 1010 (E.D. Mich. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Local 567 Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty., & Mun. Employees v. Michigan Council 25, Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty., & Mun. Employees, 635 F. Supp. 1010 (E.D. Mich. 1986). · cites it 2× “to stress that the purpose of the sex provisions of [Title VII] is to eliminate sex discrimination in employment, not to make over the accepted mores and personal sensitivities of the American people .”
People v. Meyer, 379 N.W.2d 59 (Mich. 1985). · cites it 2× “…local officer, engaged in the lawful performance of the officer's duties." MCL 333.7531(3); MSA 14.15(7531)(3). [8] MCL 14.30; MSA 3.183.”
Shirvell v. Dep't of Attorney Gen., 308 Mich. App. 702 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “MCL 14.30. The Attorney General is permitted by statute to appoint assistant attorneys general who may “appear for the state in any suit or action before any court or administrative body, or before any grand jury, with the same powers and duties and in like cases as the attorney…”
Northland Fam. Plan. Clinic, Inc. v. Cox, 487 F.3d 323 (6th Cir. 2007). “” Mich. Comp. Laws § 14.30 . Even if we were to assume that the Attorney General can prevent local prosecutors from enforcing the statute, this is somewhat beside the point, because given the non-binding nature of the opinion on the office of the Attorney General itself, it is…”
People v. Hurst, 400 N.W.2d 685 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). “Further inquiry should be made as to whether there are any other differences accorded inmates who have been sentenced to life on a Proposal B offense as opposed to inmates who have been sentenced to lengthy terms of years on a Proposal B offense.”
Platinum Sports Ltd v. Rick Snyder, 715 F.3d 615 (6th Cir. 2013). “” Mich. Comp. Laws § 14.30 . Any effort by a prosecutor at this point to enforce the statutes — keeping in mind that no one ha,s threatened any such thing — would be ultra vires.”
Rainey v. Dep't of Corr., 199 N.W.2d 829 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972). “§ 14.30 "relative to murder”. The detainer was based on a Louisiana grand jury indictment and an arrest warrant issued by the Criminal District Court, Orleans Parish, Louisiana on January 11,1968.”
In Re Petition for Appointment of Special Prosecutor, 332 N.W.2d 550 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “…General to review their complaint and rule on same pursuant to the authority granted under MCL 14.28; MSA 3.181 and MCL 14.30; MSA 3.183. Affirmed.”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. McBride, 766 N.W.2d 857 (Mich. 2009). · cites it 2× “NOTES [1] MCL 712A.17c; MCR 3.915(B)(1). [2] MCR 2.”
Christopher Pillow v. DeWayne Burton (6th Cir. 2021). “2013) (quoting Mich. Comp. Laws § 14.30 ). Yet, without the relevant pleadings from state court, the record in this case does not identify the individuals involved in Pillow’s criminal proceedings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.