Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 15.393 (2026)
Use of involuntary statement by law enforcement officer in criminal proceeding; prohibition.
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Aug. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
DISCLOSURES BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ACT
Act 563 of 2006
15.393 Use of involuntary statement by law enforcement officer in criminal proceeding; prohibition.
Sec. 3.
An involuntary statement made by a law enforcement officer, and any information derived from that involuntary statement, shall not be used against the law enforcement officer in a criminal proceeding.
History: 2006, Act 563, Imd. Eff. Dec. 29, 2006
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2014–2016 · leading case: People of Michigan v. William Little, 885 N.W.2d 832 (Mich. 2016).
People of Michigan v. William Little, 885 N.W.2d 832 (Mich. 2016). “MCL 15.393 states that an involuntary statement made by a law enforcement officer, and any information derived from that involuntary statement, shall not be used against the law enforcement officer in a criminal proceeding.”
People v. Hughes, 855 N.W.2d 209 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “The district court dismissed the obstruction-of-justice charges against all three defendants, relying on the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution and § 3 of the act concerning the disclosure of certain state- *122 merits by law enforcement officers, 3 MCL 15.”
Myers v. City of Portage, 848 N.W.2d 200 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “See MCL 15.393 (“An involuntary statement made by a law enforcement officer, and any information derived from that involuntary statement, shall not be used against the law enforcement officer in a criminal proceeding.”
People of Michigan v. Nevin Hughes, No. 150042 (Mich. June 22, 2016). “MCL 15.393 states that an involuntary statement made by a law enforcement officer, and any information derived from that involuntary statement, shall not be used against the law enforcement officer in a criminal proceeding.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.