Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 15 / Act 563 of 2006
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 15.393 (2026)

Use of involuntary statement by law enforcement officer in criminal proceeding; prohibition.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

DISCLOSURES BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ACT


Act 563 of 2006


15.393 Use of involuntary statement by law enforcement officer in criminal proceeding; prohibition.

Sec. 3.

    An involuntary statement made by a law enforcement officer, and any information derived from that involuntary statement, shall not be used against the law enforcement officer in a criminal proceeding.

History: 2006, Act 563, Imd. Eff. Dec. 29, 2006

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2014–2016 · leading case: People of Michigan v. William Little, 499 Mich. 332 (Mich. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People of Michigan v. William Little, 499 Mich. 332 (Mich. 2016). · cites it 38× “MCL 15.393 states that an involuntary statement made by a law enforcement officer, and any information derived from that involuntary statement, shall not be used against the law enforcement officer in a criminal proceeding.”
People v. Hughes, 306 Mich. App. 116 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 29× “The district court dismissed the obstruction-of-justice charges against all three defendants, relying on the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution and § 3 of the act concerning the disclosure of certain state- *122 merits by law enforcement officers, 3 MCL 15.”
Myers v. City of Portage, 304 Mich. App. 637 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “See MCL 15.393 (“An involuntary statement made by a law enforcement officer, and any information derived from that involuntary statement, shall not be used against the law enforcement officer in a criminal proceeding.”
People of Michigan v. Nevin Hughes (Mich. 2016). · cites it 20× “MCL 15.393 states that an involuntary statement made by a law enforcement officer, and any information derived from that involuntary statement, shall not be used against the law enforcement officer in a criminal proceeding.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.