Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 206.335 (2026)
Repealed. 1975, Act 233, Imd. Eff. Aug. 27, 1975.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
INCOME TAX ACT OF 1967
Act 281 of 1967
206.335 Repealed. 1975, Act 233, Imd. Eff. Aug. 27, 1975.
Repealed. 1975, Act 233, Imd. Eff. Aug. 27, 1975.
Compiler's Notes:
The repealed sections pertained to combined reports, to agreements improperly reflecting income, and to returns and payments based on distribution shares of business income.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1979–1983 · leading case: Donovan Constr. Co. v. Dep't of Treasury, 337 N.W.2d 297 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983).
Donovan Constr. Co. v. Dep't of Treasury, 337 N.W.2d 297 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “The returns were filed pursuant to § 335 of the Michigan Income Tax Act of 1967, MCL 206.335; MSA 7.557(1335). [1] The amended returns requested a refund in the amount of $339,337, plus interest.”
Clarke-Gravely Corp. v. Dep't of Treasury, 315 N.W.2d 517 (Mich. 1982). “557(1441X2), apply when the corporate claimant of the refund, who originally filed an individual income tax return, more than three years later filed a combined return as provided in § 335, MCL 206.335; MSA 7.557(1335), of said act?” The 1971 Refund We affirm the lower courts’…”
Clarke-Gravely Corp. v. Dep't of Treasury, 282 N.W.2d 202 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). “557(1441)(2), apply when the corporate claimant of the refund, who originally filed an individual income tax return, more than three years later filed a combined return as provided in § 335, MCL 206.335; MSA 7.557(1335), of said act? Where a combined return is filed within the…”
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. v. Dep't of Treasury, 335 N.W.2d 185 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “These amended returns utilized the unitary combined report method provided for in the Michigan Income Tax Act of 1967, MCL 206.335; MSA 7.557(1335), prior to the repeal of that section of the act by 1975 PA 233 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.