Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 207.805 (2026)

Michigan economic growth authority; powers; quorum; meetings; business conducted at public meeting; confidential information; written statement; disclosure; “financial or proprietary information” defined.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN ECONOMIC GROWTH AUTHORITY ACT


Act 24 of 1995


207.805 Michigan economic growth authority; powers; quorum; meetings; business conducted at public meeting; confidential information; written statement; disclosure; “financial or proprietary information” defined.

Sec. 5.

    (1) The powers of the authority are vested in the authority members in office. Regardless of the existence of a vacancy, a majority of the members of the authority constitutes a quorum necessary for the transaction of business at a meeting or the exercise of a power or function of the authority. Action may be taken by the authority at a meeting upon a vote of the majority of the members present. Members of the authority may be present in person at a meeting of the authority or, if authorized by the bylaws of the authority, by use of telecommunications or other electronic equipment.

    (2) The authority shall meet at the call of the chairperson or as may be provided by the authority. Meetings of the authority may be held anywhere within this state.

    (3) The business of the authority shall be conducted at a public meeting of the authority held in compliance with the open meetings act, 1976 PA 267, MCL 15.261 to 15.275. Public notice of the time, date, and place of the meeting shall be given as provided by the open meetings act, 1976 PA 267, MCL 15.261 to 15.275. A record or portion of a record, material, or other data received, prepared, used, or retained by the authority in connection with an application for a tax credit under section 9 that relates to financial or proprietary information submitted by the applicant that is considered by the applicant and acknowledged by the authority as confidential shall not be subject to the disclosure requirements of the freedom of information act, 1976 PA 442, MCL 15.231 to 15.246. A designee of the authority shall make the determination as to whether the authority acknowledges as confidential any financial or proprietary information submitted by the applicant and considered by the applicant as confidential. Unless considered proprietary information, the authority shall not acknowledge routine financial information as confidential. If the designee of the authority determines that information submitted to the authority is financial or proprietary information and is confidential, the designee of the authority shall release a written statement, subject to disclosure under the freedom of information act, 1976 PA 442, MCL 15.231 to 15.246, which states all of the following:

    (a) The name and business location of the person requesting that the information submitted be confidential as financial or proprietary information.

    (b) That the information submitted was determined by the designee of the authority to be confidential as financial or proprietary information.

    (c) A broad nonspecific overview of the financial or proprietary information determined to be confidential.

    (4) The authority shall not disclose financial or proprietary information not subject to disclosure pursuant to subsection (3) without consent of the applicant submitting the information.

    (5) As used in this section, "financial or proprietary information" means information that has not been publicly disseminated or is unavailable from other sources, the release of which might cause the applicant significant competitive harm. Financial or proprietary information does not include a written agreement under this act.

History: 1995, Act 24, Imd. Eff. Apr. 18, 1995 ;-- Am. 2003, Act 248, Imd. Eff. Dec. 29, 2003 ;-- Am. 2008, Act 108, Imd. Eff. Apr. 28, 2008

Compiler's Notes:

    For transfer of powers and duties of Michigan economic growth authority to Michigan strategic fund board and abolishment of Michigan economic growth authority, see E.R.O. No. 2012-4, compiled at MCL 125.1994.

PopularName Notes:

MEGA
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2020–2022 · leading case: David Sole v. Michigan Econ. Dev. Corp (Mich. Ct. App. 2020).
David Sole v. Michigan Econ. Dev. Corp (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 3× “As the trial court noted, MCL 207.805(3) of the MEGA contains a nearly-identical disclosure exemption provision.”
David Sole v. Michigan Econ. Dev. Corp (Mich. 2022). · cites it 2× “[MCL 207.805(3).] MCL 207.805(5) provides the same definition of “financial or proprietary information” as that in the MSF Act, but also states that “[f]inancial or proprietary information does not include a written agreement” under the MEGA Act.”
David Sole v. Michigan Econ. Dev. Corp (Mich. 2022). · cites it 2× “[MCL 207.805(3).] MCL 207.805(5) provides the same definition of “financial or proprietary information” as that in the MSF Act, but also states that “[f]inancial or proprietary information does not include a written agreement” under the MEGA Act.”
David Sole v. Michigan Econ. Dev. Corp (Mich. 2022). · cites it 2× “[MCL 207.805(3).] MCL 207.805(5) provides the same definition of “financial or proprietary information” as that in the MSF Act, but also states that “[f]inancial or proprietary information does not include a written agreement” under the MEGA Act.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 207.805(3) — 4 cases
David Sole v. Michigan Econ. Dev. Corp (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). “As the trial court noted, MCL 207.805(3) of the MEGA contains a nearly-identical disclosure exemption provision.”
David Sole v. Michigan Econ. Dev. Corp (Mich. 2022). “[MCL 207.805(3).] MCL 207.805(5) provides the same definition of “financial or proprietary information” as that in the MSF Act, but also states that “[f]inancial or proprietary information does not include a written agreement” under the MEGA Act.”
David Sole v. Michigan Econ. Dev. Corp (Mich. 2022). “[MCL 207.805(3).] MCL 207.805(5) provides the same definition of “financial or proprietary information” as that in the MSF Act, but also states that “[f]inancial or proprietary information does not include a written agreement” under the MEGA Act.”
David Sole v. Michigan Econ. Dev. Corp (Mich. 2022). “[MCL 207.805(3).] MCL 207.805(5) provides the same definition of “financial or proprietary information” as that in the MSF Act, but also states that “[f]inancial or proprietary information does not include a written agreement” under the MEGA Act.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 207.805(5) — 4 cases
David Sole v. Michigan Econ. Dev. Corp (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). “As the trial court noted, MCL 207.805(3) of the MEGA contains a nearly-identical disclosure exemption provision.”
David Sole v. Michigan Econ. Dev. Corp (Mich. 2022). “[MCL 207.805(3).] MCL 207.805(5) provides the same definition of “financial or proprietary information” as that in the MSF Act, but also states that “[f]inancial or proprietary information does not include a written agreement” under the MEGA Act.”
David Sole v. Michigan Econ. Dev. Corp (Mich. 2022). “[MCL 207.805(3).] MCL 207.805(5) provides the same definition of “financial or proprietary information” as that in the MSF Act, but also states that “[f]inancial or proprietary information does not include a written agreement” under the MEGA Act.”
David Sole v. Michigan Econ. Dev. Corp (Mich. 2022). “[MCL 207.805(3).] MCL 207.805(5) provides the same definition of “financial or proprietary information” as that in the MSF Act, but also states that “[f]inancial or proprietary information does not include a written agreement” under the MEGA Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.