Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 24 / Act 306 of 1969

Mich. Comp. Laws § 24.325

Judicial review; modification of final action; making award pursuant to MCL 600.2421d.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT OF 1969


Act 306 of 1969


24.325 Judicial review; modification of final action; making award pursuant to MCL 600.2421d.

Sec. 125.

    (1) A party that is dissatisfied with the final action taken by the presiding officer under section 123 in regard to costs and fees may seek judicial review of that action pursuant to chapter 6.

    (2) The court reviewing the final action of a presiding officer pursuant to subsection (1) may modify that action only if the court finds that the failure to make an award or the making of an award was an abuse of discretion, or that the calculation of the amount of the award was not based on substantial evidence.

    (3) An award of costs and fees made by a court under this section shall only be made pursuant to section 2421d of Act No. 236 of the Public Acts of 1961, being section 600.2421d of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

History: Add. 1984, Act 196, Imd. Eff. July 3, 1984

PopularName Notes:

Act 306

PopularName Notes:

APA
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2021 · leading case: Grass Lake Improvement Board v. Department of Environmental Quality
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Grass Lake Improvement Board v. Department of Environmental Quality (2016) michctapp · cites it 2× “] Under MCL 24.325(1), “a party that is dissatisfied with the final action taken by the presiding officer under section 123 [MCL 24.”
Widdoes v. Detroit Public Schools (1996) michctapp · cites it 3× “MCL 24.325; MSA 3.560(225) provides: (1) A party that is dissatisfied with the final action taken by the presiding officer under section 123 in regard to costs and fees may seek judicial review of that action pursuant to chapter 6.”
Joseph Ayotte v. Department of Health and Human Services (2021) michctapp · cites it 13× “Defendant argued that MCL 24.325 gave the circuit court authority to review the final action of a presiding officer regarding attorney fees and costs imposed under MCL 24.”
Grass Lake Improvement Board v. Dept of Environmental Quality (2016) michctapp · cites it 2× “] Under MCL 24.325(1), “a party that is dissatisfied with the final action taken by the presiding officer under section 123 [MCL 24.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 24.325(1) — 3 cases
Grass Lake Improvement Board v. Department of Environmental Quality (2016) michctapp “] Under MCL 24.325(1), “a party that is dissatisfied with the final action taken by the presiding officer under section 123 [MCL 24.”
Joseph Ayotte v. Department of Health and Human Services (2021) michctapp “Defendant argued that MCL 24.325 gave the circuit court authority to review the final action of a presiding officer regarding attorney fees and costs imposed under MCL 24.”
Grass Lake Improvement Board v. Dept of Environmental Quality (2016) michctapp “] Under MCL 24.325(1), “a party that is dissatisfied with the final action taken by the presiding officer under section 123 [MCL 24.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 24.325(2) — 3 cases
Grass Lake Improvement Board v. Department of Environmental Quality (2016) michctapp “] Under MCL 24.325(1), “a party that is dissatisfied with the final action taken by the presiding officer under section 123 [MCL 24.”
Grass Lake Improvement Board v. Dept of Environmental Quality (2016) michctapp “] Under MCL 24.325(1), “a party that is dissatisfied with the final action taken by the presiding officer under section 123 [MCL 24.”
Joseph Ayotte v. Department of Health and Human Services (2021) michctapp “Defendant argued that MCL 24.325 gave the circuit court authority to review the final action of a presiding officer regarding attorney fees and costs imposed under MCL 24.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 24.325(3) — 1 case
Joseph Ayotte v. Department of Health and Human Services (2021) michctapp “Defendant argued that MCL 24.325 gave the circuit court authority to review the final action of a presiding officer regarding attorney fees and costs imposed under MCL 24.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.