Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 247.322 (2026)
Permit; requirement, local ordinances.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
DRIVEWAYS, BANNERS, AND PARADES
Act 200 of 1969
247.322 Permit; requirement, local ordinances.
Sec. 2.
No driveway, banner or parade is lawful except pursuant to a permit issued in accordance with this act unless otherwise provided. Nothing in this act shall be construed to prevent the application of the provisions of any other statute of this state or any local ordinance which is more restrictive than this act nor to preclude any city or village from requiring city or village permits with respect to any street or highway within its corporate limits. No permit shall be issued pursuant to this act unless there is compliance with other provisions of law or ordinances.
History: 1969, Act 200, Imd. Eff. Aug. 6, 1969
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1988–2013 · leading case: Smith v. Edwards, 645 N.W.2d 304 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002).
Smith v. Edwards, 645 N.W.2d 304 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). “The driveway act provides its own definition of “driveway”: “Driveway” means a driveway, lane, road or any other way providing vehicular access to or from the highway from or to property adjoining the highway but does not mean a city or village street or other highway covered by…”
Loyer Educ. Trust v. Wayne Cnty. Road Comm'n, 425 N.W.2d 189 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). “Section 2 of this act, MCL 247.322; MSA 9.140(22), provides: No driveway, banner or parade is lawful except pursuant to a permit issued in accordance with this act unless otherwise provided.”
Scholma v. Ottawa Cnty. Road Comm'n, 303 Mich. App. 13 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). “MCL 247.322. In Turner v Washtenaw Co Rd Comm, 437 Mich 35, 37 ; 467 NW2d 4 (1991), our Supreme Court stated that a road “commission’s exercise of its authority over the public roads may be subject to judicial review where its decision is so unreasonable as to be unsupported by…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.