Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 254.311 (2026)

Mackinac bridge authority; definitions; scope of act.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MACKINAC BRIDGE AUTHORITY


Act 214 of 1952


254.311 Mackinac bridge authority; definitions; scope of act.

Sec. 1.

    As used in this act:

    (a) "Authority" means the Mackinac bridge authority created in 1950 (Ex Sess) PA 21, MCL 254.301 to 254.302. This subdivision does not apply to sections 14a, 14b, 14d, and 14e.

    (b) "Board" means the members of the authority. This subdivision does not apply to section 14b.

    (c) "Bridge" means the project for the acquisition of which this act is adopted and means a bridge or structure extending from the Upper Peninsula to the Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and includes all of the following forming any part of the bridge or connected with or used or useful in the operation of the bridge, causeways, bridges, tunnels, roads, fills and approaches, or any combination thereof, parking space and facilities, park and recreation facilities, lighting facilities, terminal facilities consisting of areas, structures, and buildings in which rest rooms, waiting rooms, restaurant and similar facilities, and other accommodations for the traveling public may be installed, including all fixtures, utility lines, accessories, and equipment relating to any or all of the above, and including the improvement and beautification of terminal areas at each end of the structure as may be designed to increase the use of the structure, and including all real and personal property, tangible or intangible, licenses, franchises, easements, and rights-of-way necessary thereto.

    (d) "Cost of the bridge" includes all expenditures made in connection with the acquisition and construction of the bridge, financing charges, interest to accrue on the bonds during the period occupied by the construction of the bridge and for a period after construction of the bridge as determined by the board, the aggregate of such periods, however, not to exceed 7 years, cost of engineering and legal expenses, plans, specifications and surveys, other expenses necessary or incidental to determining the feasibility of the project, the cost of all land, property, rights, easements and franchises, reimbursement of all money that may have been or will be paid or advanced by the state of Michigan or any of its agencies, departments, or subdivisions, and all other expenses properly incident to the acquisition of the bridge and the issuance of the bonds.

    (e) "The state" means the state of Michigan.

    (f) "The bonds" means all bonds authorized to be issued by this act.

    (g) "To construct" means to acquire through construction, purchase, gift, condemnation, or any combination thereof.

History: 1952, Act 214, Imd. Eff. Apr. 30, 1952 ;-- Am. 2018, Act 359, Imd. Eff. Dec. 12, 2018

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1954–2021 · leading case: City of Dearborn v. Michigan Tpk. Auth., 73 N.W.2d 544 (Mich. 1955).
City of Dearborn v. Michigan Tpk. Auth., 73 N.W.2d 544 (Mich. 1955). “ere the statute providing for the issuance of bonds declared they were payable solely from revenues of the State agency constructing and operating the bridge and source of payment was stated on the face of the bonds as well as the fact that they were not general obligations of…”
Nichols v. State Admin. Bd., 62 N.W.2d 103 (Mich. 1954). “However, the issuance and sale of the revenue bonds by the Mackinac Bridge Authority and the building óf the bridge are provided for by PA 1952, No 214, as amended by PA 1953, No 141 (CL 1948, § 254.311 et seq. [Stat Ann 1953 Cum Supp § 9.”
Taxpayers for Michigan Constitutional Govt v. State of Michigan (Mich. 2021). · cites it 2× “See MCL 254.311 (allowing the Mackinac Bridge Authority to construct a “bridge,” which includes all roads, facilities, parks, equipment, etc.”
Taxpayers for Michigan Constitutional Govt v. State of Michigan (Mich. 2021). · cites it 2× “See MCL 254.311 (allowing the Mackinac Bridge Authority to construct a “bridge,” which includes all roads, facilities, parks, equipment, etc.”
Enbridge Energy Lp v. State of Michigan (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). “Defendants assert on appeal that the Court of Claims improperly granted summary disposition in favor of plaintiffs because 2018 PA 359 (“the Act” or “Act 359”), amending MCL 254.311 et seq., is unconstitutional because it violates the Title-Object Clause, Const 1963, art 4, § 24.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.