Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.1103a (2026)

Transfer of cash to general fund; reimbursement.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT


Act 198 of 1965


257.1103a Transfer of cash to general fund; reimbursement.

Sec. 3a.

    (1) Upon the effective date of this amendatory act, the state treasurer is authorized to transfer the sum of $20,000,000.00 from the motor vehicle accident fund to the state general fund. The state accounting division shall treat the transfer as revenue from other funds.

    (2) To reimburse the motor vehicle accident claims fund for the cash transferred pursuant to subsection (1), there is appropriated from the general fund for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1976, the sum of $15,000,000.00 and for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1977, the sum of $5,000,000.00. There is appropriated from the general fund each fiscal year from the effective date of this act through the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1976, an amount sufficient to pay any due and payable claims which exceed available revenue of the motor vehicle accident claims fund, which amount shall be deducted from the subsequent $5,000,000.00 appropriation contained in this section to the motor vehicle accident claims fund.

History: Add. 1971, Act 19, Imd. Eff. May 5, 1971 ;-- Am. 1976, Act 89, Imd. Eff. Apr. 17, 1976

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1977–1983 · leading case: Bray v. Dep't of State, 341 N.W.2d 92 (Mich. 1983).
Bray v. Dep't of State, 341 N.W.2d 92 (Mich. 1983). · cites it 2× “5 million in interest was credited to the Fund in each of fiscal years 1969 and 1970, but, after the borrowing, by the state, less than 10% of those amounts was credited in fiscal year 1971.”
Schigur v. Sec'y of State, 251 N.W.2d 567 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “MCLA 257.1103a; MSA 9.2803(1). After July 26, 1974, the combined effect of MCLA 500.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.