Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 28 / Act 295 of 1994

Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c

Petition to discontinue registration; jurisdiction; limitations; oath; contents; false statement; filing copy with office of prosecuting attorney; notice; hearing; rights of victim; factors in court determination; granting of petition.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

SEX OFFENDERS REGISTRATION ACT


Act 295 of 1994


28.728c Petition to discontinue registration; jurisdiction; limitations; oath; contents; false statement; filing copy with office of prosecuting attorney; notice; hearing; rights of victim; factors in court determination; granting of petition.

Sec. 8c.

    (1) An individual classified as a tier I offender who meets the requirements of subsection (12) may petition the court under that subsection for an order allowing him or her to discontinue registration under this act.

    (2) An individual classified as a tier III offender who meets the requirements of subsection (13) may petition the court under that subsection for an order allowing him or her to discontinue registration under this act.

    (3) An individual classified as a tier I, tier II, or tier III offender who meets the requirements of subsection (14) or (15) may petition the court under that subsection for an order allowing him or her to discontinue registration under this act.

    (4) This section is the sole means by which an individual may obtain judicial review of his or her registration requirements under this act. This subsection does not prohibit an appeal of the conviction or sentence as otherwise provided by law or court rule. A petition filed under this section shall be filed in the court in which the individual was convicted of committing the listed offense. However, if the conviction occurred in another state or country and the individual is a resident of this state, the individual may file a petition in the circuit court in the county of his or her residence for an order allowing him or her to discontinue registration under this act only. A petition shall not be filed under this section if a previous petition was filed under this section and was denied by the court after a hearing.

    (5) A petition filed under this section shall be made under oath and shall contain all of the following:

    (a) The name and address of the petitioner.

    (b) A statement identifying the offense for which discontinuation from registration is being requested.

    (c) A statement of whether the individual was previously convicted of a listed offense for which registration is required under this act.

    (6) An individual who knowingly makes a false statement in a petition filed under this section is guilty of perjury as proscribed under section 423 of the Michigan penal code, 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.423.

    (7) A copy of the petition shall be filed with the office of the prosecuting attorney that prosecuted the case against the individual or, for a conviction that occurred in another state or country, the prosecuting attorney for the county of his or her residence, at least 30 days before a hearing is held on the petition. The prosecuting attorney may appear and participate in all proceedings regarding the petition and may seek appellate review of any decision on the petition.

    (8) If the name of the victim of the offense is known by the prosecuting attorney, the prosecuting attorney shall provide the victim with written notice that a petition has been filed and shall provide the victim with a copy of the petition. The notice shall be sent by first-class mail to the victim's last known address. The petition shall include a statement of the victim's rights under subsection (10).

    (9) If an individual properly files a petition with the court under this section, the court shall conduct a hearing on the petition as provided in this section.

    (10) The victim has the right to attend all proceedings under this section and to make a written or oral statement to the court before any decision regarding the petition is made. A victim shall not be required to appear at any proceeding under this section against his or her will.

    (11) The court shall consider all of the following in determining whether to allow the individual to discontinue registration under subsection (12) or (13) but shall not grant the petition if the court determines that the individual is a continuing threat to the public:

    (a) The individual's age and level of maturity at the time of the offense.

    (b) The victim's age and level of maturity at the time of the offense.

    (c) The nature of the offense.

    (d) The severity of the offense.

    (e) The individual's prior juvenile or criminal history.

    (f) The individual's likelihood to commit further listed offenses.

    (g) Any impact statement submitted by the victim under the William Van Regenmorter crime victim's rights act, 1985 PA 87, MCL 780.751 to 780.834, or under this section.

    (h) Any other information considered relevant by the court.

    (12) The court may grant a petition properly filed by an individual under subsection (1) if all of the following apply:

    (a) Ten or more years have elapsed since the date of his or her conviction for the listed offense or from his or her release from any period of confinement for that offense, whichever occurred last.

    (b) The petitioner has not been convicted of any felony since the date described in subdivision (a).

    (c) The petitioner has not been convicted of any listed offense since the date described in subdivision (a).

    (d) The petitioner successfully completed his or her assigned periods of supervised release, probation, or parole without revocation at any time of that supervised release, probation, or parole.

    (e) The petitioner successfully completed a sex offender treatment program certified by the United States attorney general under 42 USC 16915(b)(1), or another appropriate sex offender treatment program. The court may waive the requirements of this subdivision if successfully completing a sex offender treatment program was not a condition of the petitioner's confinement, release, probation, or parole.

    (13) The court may grant a petition properly filed by an individual under subsection (2) if all of the following apply:

    (a) The petitioner is required to register based on an order of disposition entered under section 18 of chapter XIIA of the probate code of 1939, 1939 PA 288, MCL 712A.18, that is open to the general public under section 28 of chapter XIIA of the probate code of 1939, 1939 PA 288, MCL 712A.28.

    (b) Twenty-five or more years have elapsed since the date of his or her adjudication for the listed offense or from his or her release from any period of confinement for that offense, whichever occurred last.

    (c) The petitioner has not been convicted of any felony since the date described in subdivision (b).

    (d) The petitioner has not been convicted of any listed offense since the date described in subdivision (b).

    (e) The petitioner successfully completed his or her assigned periods of supervised release, probation, or parole without revocation at any time of that supervised release, probation, or parole.

    (f) The court determines that the petitioner successfully completed a sex offender treatment program certified by the United States attorney general under 42 USC 16915(b)(1), or another appropriate sex offender treatment program. The court may waive the requirements of this subdivision if successfully completing a sex offender treatment program was not a condition of the petitioner's confinement, release, probation, or parole.

    (14) The court shall grant a petition properly filed by an individual under subsection (3) if the court determines that the conviction for the listed offense was the result of a consensual sexual act between the petitioner and the victim and any of the following apply:

    (a) All of the following:

    (i) The victim was 13 years of age or older but less than 16 years of age at the time of the offense.

    (ii) The petitioner is not more than 4 years older than the victim.

    (b) All of the following:

    (i) The individual was convicted of a violation of section 158, 338, 338a, or 338b of the Michigan penal code, 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.158, 750.338, 750.338a, and 750.338b.

    (ii) The victim was 13 years of age or older but less than 16 years of age at the time of the violation.

    (iii) The individual is not more than 4 years older than the victim.

    (c) All of the following:

    (i) The individual was convicted of a violation of section 158, 338, 338a, 338b, or 520c(1)(i) of the Michigan penal code, 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.158, 750.338, 750.338a, 750.338b, and 750.520c.

    (ii) The victim was 16 years of age or older at the time of the violation.

    (iii) The victim was not under the custodial authority of the individual at the time of the violation.

    (15) The court shall grant a petition properly filed by an individual under subsection (3) if either of the following applies:

    (a) Both of the following:

    (i) The petitioner was adjudicated as a juvenile.

    (ii) The petitioner was less than 14 years of age at the time of the offense.

    (b) The individual was registered under this act before July 1, 2011 for an offense that required registration but for which registration is not required on or after July 1, 2011.

History: Add. 2004, Act 240, Eff. Oct. 1, 2004 ;-- Am. 2011, Act 18, Eff. July 1, 2011

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29 cases (13 in the last 5 years), 2008–2025 · leading case: People v. Costner
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Costner (2015) michctapp · cites it 31× “” The phrase “not more than” limits the definition of the word “year”. Therefore, because this Defendant is 23 days older than the 4 years required under the Statute, I find that he does not meet the requirements set forth in MCL 28.”
People v. Hesch (2008) michctapp · cites it 20× “We must determine whether a reviewing court has discretion under MCL 28.728c to remove the requirement under MCL 28.”
In re MS (2011) michctapp · cites it 14× “This Court has summarized the SORA provision that allows certain juvenile offenders to be removed from the sex offender registry: Certain juveniles required to register as sex offenders who are identified under MCL 28.728c may petition the court in which they were convicted to…”
People v. Clark (2016) michctapp · cites it 2× “See MCL 28.728c(12)(d) and (13)(e)2 (requiring that the “petitioner successfully completed his or her assigned periods of supervised release, probation or parole”).”
People v. Temelkoski (2014) michctapp · cites it 3× “That exception is codified at MCL 28.728c(3) and (14), and provides as follows: (3) An individual classified as a tier I, tier II, or tier III offender who meets the requirements of subsection (14).”
People v. Corr (2024) ny “Idaho Code Ann § 18-8310 [1]; Mich Comp Laws Ann § 28.728c [4]; NH Rev Stat Ann § 651-B:6 [II], [V]), or clarifying that a sex offender must register for the longer of the time required in their state of residence or in their state of conviction ( see e.”
In re TD (2011) michctapp · cites it 4× “Shortly after reaching age 18, TD petitioned the trial court for certain relief from the SORA’s registration requirements under MCL 28.728c. MCL 28.728c(3) states, “This section is the sole means by which an individual may obtain judicial review of his or her registration…”
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (2017) michctapp · cites it 24× “Defendant did not appeal the decision. Defendant was discharged from probation on March 6, 2003.”
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (2017) michctapp · cites it 24× “Defendant did not appeal the decision. Defendant was discharged from probation on March 6, 2003.”
People of Michigan v. Wayne Duane Jenkins (2017) michctapp · cites it 13× “According to the prosecutor, given his tier-III status, defendant is subject to lifetime sex offender registration under SORA, including inclusion on the PSOR.”
People of Michigan v. Wayne Duane Jenkins (2017) michctapp · cites it 13× “According to the prosecutor, given his tier-III status, defendant is subject to lifetime sex offender registration under SORA, including inclusion on the PSOR.”
People of Michigan v. Dylan Taylor Misiewicz (2019) michctapp · cites it 12× “728c states in pertinent part: (3) An individual classified as a tier I, tier II, or tier III offender who meets the requirements of subsection (14) or (15) may petition the court under that subsection for an order allowing him or her to discontinue registration under this act.”
Show all 29 citing cases →
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(1) — 2 cases
In re MS (2011) michctapp “This Court has summarized the SORA provision that allows certain juvenile offenders to be removed from the sex offender registry: Certain juveniles required to register as sex offenders who are identified under MCL 28.728c may petition the court in which they were convicted to…”
In Re Ryan Douglas Harder (2025) michctapp
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(11) — 2 cases
People of Michigan v. Stephen Matthew Butka (2022) michctapp
People of Michigan v. Stephen Matthew Butka (2024) mich
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(11)(g) — 1 case
People of Michigan v. Stephen Matthew Butka (2022) michctapp
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(12) — 3 cases
People v. Hesch (2008) michctapp “We must determine whether a reviewing court has discretion under MCL 28.728c to remove the requirement under MCL 28.”
People Of Mi V Cora Ladane Lymon (2022) michctapp
People v Kardasz (2025) mich
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(12)(d) — 1 case
People v. Clark (2016) michctapp “See MCL 28.728c(12)(d) and (13)(e)2 (requiring that the “petitioner successfully completed his or her assigned periods of supervised release, probation or parole”).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(13) — 4 cases
People of Michigan v. Wayne Duane Jenkins (2017) michctapp “According to the prosecutor, given his tier-III status, defendant is subject to lifetime sex offender registration under SORA, including inclusion on the PSOR.”
People of Michigan v. Wayne Duane Jenkins (2017) michctapp “According to the prosecutor, given his tier-III status, defendant is subject to lifetime sex offender registration under SORA, including inclusion on the PSOR.”
People v Kardasz (2025) mich
People of Michigan v. David John Kiczenski (2024) michctapp
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(14) — 12 cases
People v. Costner (2015) michctapp “” The phrase “not more than” limits the definition of the word “year”. Therefore, because this Defendant is 23 days older than the 4 years required under the Statute, I find that he does not meet the requirements set forth in MCL 28.”
People v. Hesch (2008) michctapp “We must determine whether a reviewing court has discretion under MCL 28.728c to remove the requirement under MCL 28.”
In re TD (2011) michctapp “Shortly after reaching age 18, TD petitioned the trial court for certain relief from the SORA’s registration requirements under MCL 28.728c. MCL 28.728c(3) states, “This section is the sole means by which an individual may obtain judicial review of his or her registration…”
People of Michigan v. Dylan Taylor Misiewicz (2019) michctapp “728c states in pertinent part: (3) An individual classified as a tier I, tier II, or tier III offender who meets the requirements of subsection (14) or (15) may petition the court under that subsection for an order allowing him or her to discontinue registration under this act.”
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (2017) michctapp “Defendant did not appeal the decision. Defendant was discharged from probation on March 6, 2003.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(14)(a) — 5 cases
People of Michigan v. Dylan Taylor Misiewicz (2019) michctapp “728c states in pertinent part: (3) An individual classified as a tier I, tier II, or tier III offender who meets the requirements of subsection (14) or (15) may petition the court under that subsection for an order allowing him or her to discontinue registration under this act.”
People v Kardasz (2025) mich
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (2017) michctapp “Defendant did not appeal the decision. Defendant was discharged from probation on March 6, 2003.”
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (2017) michctapp “Defendant did not appeal the decision. Defendant was discharged from probation on March 6, 2003.”
People of Michigan v. Jason Edward Koert (2024) michctapp
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(14)(a)(ii) — 3 cases
People v. Costner (2015) michctapp “” The phrase “not more than” limits the definition of the word “year”. Therefore, because this Defendant is 23 days older than the 4 years required under the Statute, I find that he does not meet the requirements set forth in MCL 28.”
People of Michigan v. Evans Costner III (2015) michctapp
People of Michigan v. Casey David Ward (2019) michctapp
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(14)(c) — 3 cases
People v. Hesch (2008) michctapp “We must determine whether a reviewing court has discretion under MCL 28.728c to remove the requirement under MCL 28.”
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (2017) michctapp “Defendant did not appeal the decision. Defendant was discharged from probation on March 6, 2003.”
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (2017) michctapp “Defendant did not appeal the decision. Defendant was discharged from probation on March 6, 2003.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(14)(c)(i) — 1 case
People v. Hesch (2008) michctapp “We must determine whether a reviewing court has discretion under MCL 28.728c to remove the requirement under MCL 28.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(14)(c)(ii) — 2 cases
People v. Hesch (2008) michctapp “We must determine whether a reviewing court has discretion under MCL 28.728c to remove the requirement under MCL 28.”
In re TD (2011) michctapp “Shortly after reaching age 18, TD petitioned the trial court for certain relief from the SORA’s registration requirements under MCL 28.728c. MCL 28.728c(3) states, “This section is the sole means by which an individual may obtain judicial review of his or her registration…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(14)(c)(iii) — 1 case
People v. Hesch (2008) michctapp “We must determine whether a reviewing court has discretion under MCL 28.728c to remove the requirement under MCL 28.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(15) — 2 cases
People v. Hesch (2008) michctapp “We must determine whether a reviewing court has discretion under MCL 28.728c to remove the requirement under MCL 28.”
In re MS (2011) michctapp “This Court has summarized the SORA provision that allows certain juvenile offenders to be removed from the sex offender registry: Certain juveniles required to register as sex offenders who are identified under MCL 28.728c may petition the court in which they were convicted to…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(15)(a) — 5 cases
People v. Hesch (2008) michctapp “We must determine whether a reviewing court has discretion under MCL 28.728c to remove the requirement under MCL 28.”
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (2017) michctapp “Defendant did not appeal the decision. Defendant was discharged from probation on March 6, 2003.”
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (2017) michctapp “Defendant did not appeal the decision. Defendant was discharged from probation on March 6, 2003.”
People of Michigan v. Wayne Duane Jenkins (2017) michctapp “According to the prosecutor, given his tier-III status, defendant is subject to lifetime sex offender registration under SORA, including inclusion on the PSOR.”
People of Michigan v. Wayne Duane Jenkins (2017) michctapp “According to the prosecutor, given his tier-III status, defendant is subject to lifetime sex offender registration under SORA, including inclusion on the PSOR.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(15)(a)(i) — 1 case
People v. Hesch (2008) michctapp “We must determine whether a reviewing court has discretion under MCL 28.728c to remove the requirement under MCL 28.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(15)(b) — 6 cases
In re MS (2011) michctapp “This Court has summarized the SORA provision that allows certain juvenile offenders to be removed from the sex offender registry: Certain juveniles required to register as sex offenders who are identified under MCL 28.728c may petition the court in which they were convicted to…”
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (2017) michctapp “Defendant did not appeal the decision. Defendant was discharged from probation on March 6, 2003.”
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (2017) michctapp “Defendant did not appeal the decision. Defendant was discharged from probation on March 6, 2003.”
People of Michigan v. Wayne Duane Jenkins (2017) michctapp “According to the prosecutor, given his tier-III status, defendant is subject to lifetime sex offender registration under SORA, including inclusion on the PSOR.”
People of Michigan v. Wayne Duane Jenkins (2017) michctapp “According to the prosecutor, given his tier-III status, defendant is subject to lifetime sex offender registration under SORA, including inclusion on the PSOR.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(2) — 5 cases
People of Michigan v. Wayne Duane Jenkins (2017) michctapp “According to the prosecutor, given his tier-III status, defendant is subject to lifetime sex offender registration under SORA, including inclusion on the PSOR.”
People of Michigan v. Wayne Duane Jenkins (2017) michctapp “According to the prosecutor, given his tier-III status, defendant is subject to lifetime sex offender registration under SORA, including inclusion on the PSOR.”
People of Michigan v. David Christopher Morales (2024) michctapp
People of Michigan v. David John Kiczenski (2024) michctapp
20250218_C365434_47_365434.Opn.Pdf (2025) michctapp
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(3) — 7 cases
People v. Temelkoski (2014) michctapp “That exception is codified at MCL 28.728c(3) and (14), and provides as follows: (3) An individual classified as a tier I, tier II, or tier III offender who meets the requirements of subsection (14).”
In re TD (2011) michctapp “Shortly after reaching age 18, TD petitioned the trial court for certain relief from the SORA’s registration requirements under MCL 28.728c. MCL 28.728c(3) states, “This section is the sole means by which an individual may obtain judicial review of his or her registration…”
People of Michigan v. Bryan Michael Rozengard (2017) michctapp
People of Michigan v. Bryan Michael Rozengard (2017) michctapp
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (2017) michctapp “Defendant did not appeal the decision. Defendant was discharged from probation on March 6, 2003.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(4) — 5 cases
In re MS (2011) michctapp “This Court has summarized the SORA provision that allows certain juvenile offenders to be removed from the sex offender registry: Certain juveniles required to register as sex offenders who are identified under MCL 28.728c may petition the court in which they were convicted to…”
People of Michigan v. Wayne Duane Jenkins (2017) michctapp “According to the prosecutor, given his tier-III status, defendant is subject to lifetime sex offender registration under SORA, including inclusion on the PSOR.”
People of Michigan v. Wayne Duane Jenkins (2017) michctapp “According to the prosecutor, given his tier-III status, defendant is subject to lifetime sex offender registration under SORA, including inclusion on the PSOR.”
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (2017) michctapp “Defendant did not appeal the decision. Defendant was discharged from probation on March 6, 2003.”
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (2017) michctapp “Defendant did not appeal the decision. Defendant was discharged from probation on March 6, 2003.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.728c(l) — 2 cases
People v. Hesch (2008) michctapp “We must determine whether a reviewing court has discretion under MCL 28.728c to remove the requirement under MCL 28.”
In re MS (2011) michctapp “This Court has summarized the SORA provision that allows certain juvenile offenders to be removed from the sex offender registry: Certain juveniles required to register as sex offenders who are identified under MCL 28.728c may petition the court in which they were convicted to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.