Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 324 / Act 451 of 1994
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.1702 (2026)

Payment of costs or judgment; posting surety bond or cash; amount.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT


Act 451 of 1994


324.1702 Payment of costs or judgment; posting surety bond or cash; amount.

Sec. 1702.

    If the court has reasonable grounds to doubt the solvency of the plaintiff or the plaintiff's ability to pay any cost or judgment that might be rendered against him or her in an action brought under this part, the court may order the plaintiff to post a surety bond or cash in an amount of not more than $500.00.

History: 1994, Act 451, Eff. Mar. 30, 1995

PopularName Notes:

Act 451

PopularName Notes:

NREPA
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2004–2004 · leading case: Preserve the Dunes, Inc v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 684 N.W.2d 847 (Mich. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Preserve the Dunes, Inc v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 684 N.W.2d 847 (Mich. 2004). · cites it 4× “Nemeth, therefore, does not support the argument that a violation of the SDMA may serve as a prima facie violation of MEPA.”
Preserve the Dunes Inc v. Dept of Env't Quality (Mich. 2004). · cites it 2× “Nemeth, therefore, does not support the argument that a violation of the SDMA may serve as a prima facie violation of MEPA.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.1702(2) — 2 cases
Preserve the Dunes, Inc v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 684 N.W.2d 847 (Mich. 2004). “Nemeth, therefore, does not support the argument that a violation of the SDMA may serve as a prima facie violation of MEPA.”
Preserve the Dunes Inc v. Dept of Env't Quality (Mich. 2004). “Nemeth, therefore, does not support the argument that a violation of the SDMA may serve as a prima facie violation of MEPA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.