Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.90106 (2026)

Repeal of certain acts.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT

Act 451 of 1994

324.90106 Repeal of certain acts.

Sec. 90106.

(1) The following acts that are codified in article III, chapter 4, entitled recreation, are repealed:

PUBLIC ACT NUMBER	YEAR OF ACT	MICHIGAN COMPILED LAWS SECTIONS
326	1965	299.121 to 299.127
316	1965	299.111 to 299.116
221	1987	318.531 to 318.541
327	1988	318.551 to 318.560
329	1988	318.571 to 318.586
27	1993	299.131 to 299.144
225	1964	318.231 to 318.233
323	1976	317.171 to 317.181
201	1953	300.201
149	1960	318.301 to 318.314
48	1952	322.601 to 322.608
130	1994	318.331 to 318.337
57	1993	322.821 to 322.826
173	1929	299.51 to 299.57
355	1927	318.61 to 318.67
201	1958	318.201 to 318.208
22	1907	318.91 to 318.93
45	1943	318.101 to 318.102
20	1955	318.71 to 318.72
70	1957	318.121 to 318.122
54	1909	318.81 to 318.84
320	1947	281.501 to 281.511
125	1959	281.531 to 281.538
187	1964	281.521 to 281.523
79	1988	281.1251 to 281.1268
66	1952	281.541 to 281.543
303	1967	281.1001 to 281.1199
160	1976	281.1201 to 281.1223
319	1975	257.1601 to 257.1626
74	1968	257.1501 to 257.1543

(2) The following acts and parts of acts are not codified in this act but are repealed:

PUBLIC ACT NUMBER	YEAR OF ACT	MICHIGAN COMPILED LAWS SECTIONS
257	1968	318.351 to 318.362
108	1969	318.371 to 318.387

History: Add. 1995, Act 58, Imd. Eff. May 24, 1995

PopularName Notes:

Act 451

PopularName Notes:

NREPA

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1999–1999 · leading case: People v. Sartor, 599 N.W.2d 532 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

People v. Sartor, 599 N.W.2d 532 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “Therefore, the requirements of M.C.L. § 257.619; MSA 9.2319 were not met, and defendant was required to remain at the scene under M.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.