Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1401 (2026)

"Person requiring treatment" defined; exception.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MENTAL HEALTH CODE


Act 258 of 1974


330.1401 "Person requiring treatment" defined; exception.

Sec. 401.

    (1) As used in this chapter, "person requiring treatment" means (a), (b), or (c):

    (a) An individual who has mental illness, and who as a result of that mental illness can reasonably be expected within the near future to intentionally or unintentionally seriously physically injure himself, herself, or another individual, and who has engaged in an act or acts or made significant threats that are substantially supportive of the expectation.

    (b) An individual who has mental illness, and who as a result of that mental illness is unable to attend to those of his or her basic physical needs such as food, clothing, or shelter that must be attended to in order for the individual to avoid serious harm in the near future, and who has demonstrated that inability by failing to attend to those basic physical needs.

    (c) An individual who has mental illness, whose judgment is so impaired by that mental illness, and whose lack of understanding of the need for treatment has caused him or her to demonstrate an unwillingness to voluntarily participate in or adhere to treatment that is necessary, on the basis of competent clinical opinion, to prevent a relapse or harmful deterioration of his or her condition, and presents a substantial risk of significant physical or mental harm to the individual or others.

    (2) An individual whose mental processes have been weakened or impaired by a dementia, an individual with a primary diagnosis of epilepsy, or an individual with alcoholism or other drug dependence is not a person requiring treatment under this chapter unless the individual also meets the criteria specified in subsection (1). An individual described in this subsection may be hospitalized under the informal or formal voluntary hospitalization provisions of this chapter if he or she is considered clinically suitable for hospitalization by the hospital director.

History: 1974, Act 258, Eff. Nov. 6, 1974 ;-- Am. 1975, Act 179, Eff. Aug. 6, 1975 ;-- Am. 1995, Act 290, Eff. Mar. 28, 1996 ;-- Am. 2004, Act 496, Eff. Mar. 30, 2005 ;-- Am. 2016, Act 320, Eff. Feb. 14, 2017 ;-- Am. 2018, Act 593, Eff. Mar. 28, 2019

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 97 cases (59 in the last 5 years), 1977–2026 · leading case: People v. Portus (In Re Portus), 926 N.W.2d 33 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018).
People v. Portus (In Re Portus), 926 N.W.2d 33 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 3× “The relevant statutory definition of a "person requiring treatment" is *39 contained in MCL 330.1401. 2 In this case, respondent *386 conceded that he was a "person requiring treatment"; hence, the first step is not at issue.”
Zucker v. City of Farmington Hills, 643 F. App'x 555 (6th Cir. 2016). “…physical needs” or "understand his or her need for treatment" is reasonably expected to cause harm to the individual. Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1401 (1)(a)-(c).”
United States v. Christopher Perkins, 67 F.4th 583 (4th Cir. 2023). · cites it 4× “123, §§ 1, 8(a) (West 2022); Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 330.1401 (1) (West 2022); Minn.”
People v. Goad, 364 N.W.2d 584 (Mich. 1985). · cites it 4× “[8] For example, the jurors are not given the statutory definitions of "a person requiring treatment," MCL 330.1401; MSA 14.800(401), or of whom may be a candidate for judicial admission, MCL 330.”
Canon v. Thumudo, 422 N.W.2d 688 (Mich. 1988). · cites it 2× “The relevant language in MCL 330.1401; MSA 14.800(401) defines a "person requiring treatment” as, inter alia: (a) A person who is mentally ill, and who as a result of that mental illness can reasonably be expected within the near future to intentionally or unintentionally…”
People v. Kevorkian, 527 N.W.2d 714 (Mich. 1994). · cites it 2× “, MCL 330.1401(a); MSA 14.800(401)(a). [56] Alas Stat 11.”
People v. Davis, 871 N.W.2d 392 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 3× “2031 permits the court to direct the prosecution to pursue civil commitment procedures: [T]he court may direct a prosecuting attorney to file a petition asserting that the defendant is a person requiring treatment as defined by [MCL 330.1401][ 1 ] or meets the criteria for…”
People v. Mangiapane, 271 N.W.2d 240 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 2× “alth services; to establish certain miscellaneous provisions relating to mental health; to establish procedures pertaining to mentally ill and mentally retarded persons who are under criminal sentence, to persons who are mentally incompetent to stand trial, and to persons who…”
City of Livonia v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 378 N.W.2d 402 (Mich. 1985). “MCL 330.1401; MSA 14.800(401). An individual can be voluntarily hospitalized if he is deemed to be clinically suitable for hospitalization.”
United States v. McMichael, 350 F. Supp. 3d 647 (W.D. Mich. 2018). · cites it 2× “Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1401 defines "person requiring treatment" as any one of the following: (a) An individual who has mental illness, and who as a result of that mental illness can reasonably be expected within the near future to intentionally or unintentionally seriously…”
Teasel v. Dep't of Mental Health, 355 N.W.2d 75 (Mich. 1984). “) MCL 330.1401; MSA 14.800(401) provides: "As used in this chapter 'persons requiring treatment’ means (a), (b), or (c): "(a) A person who is mentally ill, and who as a result of that mental illness can reasonably be expected within the near future to intentionally or…”
Fuhrmann v. Hattaway, 311 N.W.2d 379 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “The purpose of such examination and evaluation is to determine whether the person meets the criteria for a "person requiring treatment” under MCL 330.1401; MSA 14.800(401). This function is created by statute, is performed solely for governmental purposes and has no…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1401(1) — 35 cases
People v. Davis, 871 N.W.2d 392 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “2031 permits the court to direct the prosecution to pursue civil commitment procedures: [T]he court may direct a prosecuting attorney to file a petition asserting that the defendant is a person requiring treatment as defined by [MCL 330.1401][ 1 ] or meets the criteria for…”
In Re Nbj (Mich. Ct. App. 2025).
in Re Amy Lynn Willis (Mich. Ct. App. 2021).
in Re Brandon Michael Prosinski (Mich. Ct. App. 2018).
In Re Starr Eubank (Mich. Ct. App. 2022).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1401(1)(A) — 1 case
In Re Car (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1401(1)(C) — 1 case
In Re Car (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1401(1)(a) — 40 cases
In Re Bjp (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
in Re Svetlana Tchakarova (Mich. Ct. App. 2019).
In Re Starr Eubank (Mich. Ct. App. 2022).
In Re Mat (Mich. Ct. App. 2024).
20241218_C370551_23_370551.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2024).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1401(1)(b) — 15 cases
In Re Bsm (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
In Re Wm (Mich. Ct. App. 2024).
20250123_C370552_28_370552.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2025).
in Re Karen Bowen (Mich. Ct. App. 2021).
20240215_C367990_33_367990.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2024).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1401(1)(c) — 33 cases
In Re Djb (Mich. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Cb (Mich. Ct. App. 2024).
In Re Jm (Mich. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Es (Mich. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Tav (Mich. Ct. App. 2025).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1401(2) — 2 cases
In Re Rjm (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
Pelichet v. Gordon (E.D. Mich. 2019).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1401(a) — 7 cases
People v. Kevorkian, 527 N.W.2d 714 (Mich. 1994). “, MCL 330.1401(a); MSA 14.800(401)(a). [56] Alas Stat 11.”
People v. Stevens, 761 P.2d 768 (Colo. 1988).
in Re Evan Benford (Mich. Ct. App. 2021).
in Re Amy Lynn Willis (Mich. Ct. App. 2021).
In Re Nbj (Mich. Ct. App. 2025).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1401(b) — 1 case
20250123_C370552_28_370552.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2025).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1401(c) — 1 case
In Re Rjm (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.