Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1464a (2026)

Order of involuntary hospitalization or combination of hospitalization and assisted outpatient treatment; entering or removing order from law enforcement information network; applicability of section to order of involuntary treatment for substance use disorder.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MENTAL HEALTH CODE


Act 258 of 1974


330.1464a Order of involuntary hospitalization or combination of hospitalization and assisted outpatient treatment; entering or removing order from law enforcement information network; applicability of section to order of involuntary treatment for substance use disorder.

Sec. 464a.

    (1) Upon entry of a court order directing that an individual be involuntarily hospitalized under this chapter or that an individual involuntarily undergo a program of combined hospitalization and assisted outpatient treatment under this chapter, the court shall immediately order the department of state police to enter the court order into the law enforcement information network. The department of state police shall remove the court order from the law enforcement information network only upon receipt of a subsequent court order for that removal.

    (2) The department of state police shall immediately enter an order described in subsection (1) into the law enforcement information network or shall immediately remove an order from the law enforcement information network as ordered by the court under this section.

    (3) This section does not apply to an order of involuntary treatment for substance use disorder under chapter 2A.

History: Add. 1994, Act 339, Eff. Apr. 1, 1996 ;-- Am. 2014, Act 200, Imd. Eff. June 24, 2014 ;-- Am. 2018, Act 593, Eff. Mar. 28, 2019

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2018–2021 · leading case: in the Matter of Jefarsan Shamoon (Mich. Ct. App. 2018).
in the Matter of Jefarsan Shamoon (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 3× “422b gives the Department of State Police exclusive authority to remove information from the LEIN; indeed, MCL 330.1464a requires a court order as a prerequisite in circumstances such as those in the present case.”
in the Matter of Jefarsan Shamoon (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 3× “422b gives the Department of State Police exclusive authority to remove information from the LEIN; indeed, MCL 330.1464a requires a court order as a prerequisite in circumstances such as those in the present case.”
in Re Evan Benford (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “However, pursuant to MCL 330.1464a(1), a court can order respondent’s involuntary commitment to be removed from LEIN.”
in Re Evan Benford (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “However, despite the fact that respondent’s involuntary treatment triggered his information being entered into LEIN, MCL 330.1464a, we cannot conclude that this error affected respondent’s substantial rights -5- because there is no evidence to suggest that had respondent been…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1464a(1) — 3 cases
in Re Evan Benford (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “However, pursuant to MCL 330.1464a(1), a court can order respondent’s involuntary commitment to be removed from LEIN.”
in the Matter of Jefarsan Shamoon (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “422b gives the Department of State Police exclusive authority to remove information from the LEIN; indeed, MCL 330.1464a requires a court order as a prerequisite in circumstances such as those in the present case.”
in the Matter of Jefarsan Shamoon (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “422b gives the Department of State Police exclusive authority to remove information from the LEIN; indeed, MCL 330.1464a requires a court order as a prerequisite in circumstances such as those in the present case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.