Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 330 / Act 258 of 1974
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1472 (2026)

Repealed. 1996, Act 588, Imd. Eff. Jan. 21, 1997.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MENTAL HEALTH CODE


Act 258 of 1974


330.1472 Repealed. 1996, Act 588, Imd. Eff. Jan. 21, 1997.

    Repealed. 1996, Act 588, Imd. Eff. Jan. 21, 1997.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed section pertained to duration of hospitalization.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1978–1983 · leading case: Chrite v. United States, 564 F. Supp. 341 (E.D. Mich. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Chrite v. United States, 564 F. Supp. 341 (E.D. Mich. 1983). “§§ 330.1472(2), 330.1472(3)]. III. The Michigan Supreme Court has not ruled whether, under the factual circumstances alleged in this case, there is a duty to restrain an individual beyond a sixty day commitment order or a duty to warn third persons of an individual’s dangerous…”
People Ex Rel Book v. Hooker, 268 N.W.2d 698 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 2× “In order to justify a 90-day recommitment order under § 472(2) of the Michigan Mental Health Code MCL 330.1472; MSA 14.800(472), must the petitioner show that the patient is a "person requiring treatment” (hereinafter PRT) as defined in § 401 of the code, i.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1472(2) — 1 case
Chrite v. United States, 564 F. Supp. 341 (E.D. Mich. 1983). “§§ 330.1472(2), 330.1472(3)]. III. The Michigan Supreme Court has not ruled whether, under the factual circumstances alleged in this case, there is a duty to restrain an individual beyond a sixty day commitment order or a duty to warn third persons of an individual’s dangerous…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.