Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 333 / Initiated Law 1 of 2008
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.26421 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN MEDICAL MARIHUANA ACT


Initiated Law 1 of 2008


333.26421 Short title.

    1. Short Title.

    Sec. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act.

History: 2008, Initiated Law 1, Eff. Dec. 4, 2008

Compiler's Notes:

    MCL 333.26430 of Initiated Law 1 of 2008 provides:

    10. Severability.

    Sec. 10. Any section of this act being held invalid as to any person or circumstances shall not affect the application of any other section of this act that can be given full effect without the invalid section or application.

    For the transfer of powers and duties of the department of licensing and regulatory affairs, including its bureau of marijuana regulation, to the marijuana regulatory agency, and abolishment of the bureau of marijuana regulation, see E.R.O. No. 2019-2, compiled at MCL 333.27001.

    For the renaming of the marijuana regulatory agency to the cannabis regulatory agency, see E.R.O. No. 2022-1, compiled at MCL 333.27002.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 228 cases (45 in the last 5 years), 2009–2026 · leading case: State of Michigan v. Mcqueen, 828 N.W.2d 644 (Mich. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Michigan v. Mcqueen, 828 N.W.2d 644 (Mich. 2013). · cites it 7× “McQueen was a registered qualifying patient and a registered primary caregiver for three qualifying patients under the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), MCL 333.26421 et seq. Taylor was the registered primary caregiver for two qualifying patients.”
People v. Mazur, 872 N.W.2d 201 (Mich. 2015). · cites it 4× “We hold that a defendant claiming that he or she is solely in the presence or vicinity of the medical use of marijuana is not entitled to immunity under MCL 333.”
People of Michigan v. Robert Tuttle, 870 N.W.2d 37 (Mich. 2015). · cites it 3× “In 2008, the voters of Michigan passed into law a ballot initiative 1 now codified as the Michigan Medical Marihuana 2 Act (MMMA), MCL 333.26421 et seq. Unlike the procedures for the editing and drafting of bills proposed through the Legislature, the electorate—those who enacted…”
People v. Feezel, 783 N.W.2d 67 (Mich. 2010). · cites it 2× “[27] After all, alcohol is a legal substance, and no one would suggest that the Legislature could not restrict from driving those who consume alcohol.”
Joseph Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 695 F.3d 428 (6th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “The Michigan Medical Marihuana Act In 2008, Michigan passed the MMMA, Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.26421 et seq., to provide protections for the medical use of marijuana.”
People v. Danto, 294 Mich. App. 596 (Mich. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “303525 (Danto), the respective defendants appeal by leave granted the trial court’s order granting the prosecution’s motion to preclude assertion of the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMA), MCL 333.26421 et seq., 1 as an affirmative defense and to preclude reference to the MMA…”
Vasquez v. Lewis, 834 F.3d 1132 (10th Cir. 2016). · cites it 2× “; Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 333.26421 et seq.; Minn.”
People v. Redden, 290 Mich. App. 65 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “In this case involving the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), MCL 333.26421 et seq., defendant Robert Lee Redden and defendant Torey Alison Clark appeal by leave granted a December 10, 2009, circuit court order reversing for each defendant the district court’s dismissal of a…”
People v. Bosca, 871 N.W.2d 307 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “At trial, defendant asserted that he was a licensed caregiver under the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act *10 (MMMA), MCL 333.26421 et seq., 3 and presented the testimony of an expert, Frank Telewski, a Michigan State University professor of water and plant biology.”
K.V.G. Props., Inc. v. Westfield Ins. Co., 900 F.3d 818 (6th Cir. 2018). “1 (2008), Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 333.26421 - 333.26430.”
Ter Beek v. City of Wyoming, 846 N.W.2d 531 (Mich. 2014). “The Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), MCL 333.26421 et seq., enacted pursuant to a voter initiative in November 2008, affords certain protections under state law for the medical use of marijuana in the state of Michigan.”
People of Michigan v. Robert Elijah Anthony, 932 N.W.2d 202 (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “Consequently, the trial court erred when it excluded the evidence seized during the search on the basis that the officers needed to have a valid justification to stop next to defendant's vehicle on a public street, and we reverse the trial court's order suppressing the evidence…”
Show all 228 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.