Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.7121 (2026)
Application and construction of article.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
PUBLIC HEALTH CODE
Act 368 of 1978
333.7121 Application and construction of article.
Sec. 7121.
(1) This article applies to violations of law, seizures and forfeitures, injunctive proceedings, administrative proceedings, and investigations which occur after its effective date.
(2) This article shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this article among those states which enact laws similar to it.
History: 1978, Act 368, Eff. Sept. 30, 1978
PopularName Notes:
Act 368Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2007–2024 · leading case: People v. Thompson, 730 N.W.2d 708 (Mich. 2007).
People v. Thompson, 730 N.W.2d 708 (Mich. 2007). “Nor do they require us to adopt other states’ erroneous interpretations of their own substantially similar statutes.”
People of Michigan v. Richard Allen Baham, 909 N.W.2d 836 (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “1111(1) ; MCL 333.7121(2) ; People v. Thompson , 477 Mich.”
People of Michigan v. Keith Demond Thompson (Mich. 2007). “Nor do they require us to adopt other states’ erroneous interpretations of their own substantially similar statutes.”
People of Michigan v. Richard Allen Baham (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “1111(1); MCL 333.7121(2); People v Thompson, 477 Mich 146 , 155 n 9; 730 NW2d 708 (2007).”
People of Michigan v. Bradley Axel Lafferty (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “625(8) prohibits the operation of a motor vehicle with any amount of a Schedule 1 controlled substance in the body.”
D in Re Forfeiture of 2006 Saturn Ion (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “7521(1)(d) is nearly identical to § 505(a)(4) of Uniform Controlled Substances Act (1970).”
In Re Forfeiture of 2006 Saturn Ion (Mich. 2024). “See MCL 333.7121(2) (“This article shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this article among those states which enact laws similar to it.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.7121(1) — 2 cases
People v. Thompson, 730 N.W.2d 708 (Mich. 2007). “Nor do they require us to adopt other states’ erroneous interpretations of their own substantially similar statutes.”
People of Michigan v. Keith Demond Thompson (Mich. 2007). “Nor do they require us to adopt other states’ erroneous interpretations of their own substantially similar statutes.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.7121(1)(c) — 1 case
People of Michigan v. Bradley Axel Lafferty (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “625(8) prohibits the operation of a motor vehicle with any amount of a Schedule 1 controlled substance in the body.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.7121(2) — 6 cases
People v. Thompson, 730 N.W.2d 708 (Mich. 2007). “Nor do they require us to adopt other states’ erroneous interpretations of their own substantially similar statutes.”
People of Michigan v. Richard Allen Baham, 909 N.W.2d 836 (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “1111(1) ; MCL 333.7121(2) ; People v. Thompson , 477 Mich.”
People of Michigan v. Keith Demond Thompson (Mich. 2007). “Nor do they require us to adopt other states’ erroneous interpretations of their own substantially similar statutes.”
People of Michigan v. Richard Allen Baham (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “1111(1); MCL 333.7121(2); People v Thompson, 477 Mich 146 , 155 n 9; 730 NW2d 708 (2007).”
D in Re Forfeiture of 2006 Saturn Ion (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “7521(1)(d) is nearly identical to § 505(a)(4) of Uniform Controlled Substances Act (1970).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.