Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 338.1067 (2026)

Employees of licensee; conduct and qualifications; personnel information; employee roster to be filed with department; false statements or representations; revocation of license; misdemeanor.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PRIVATE SECURITY BUSINESS AND SECURITY ALARM ACT


Act 330 of 1968


338.1067 Employees of licensee; conduct and qualifications; personnel information; employee roster to be filed with department; false statements or representations; revocation of license; misdemeanor.

Sec. 17.

    (1) A licensee may employ as many persons as he or she considers necessary to assist him or her in his or her work of security alarm system contractor, private security police, private college security force, or private security guard and in the conduct of his or her business, and at all times during the employment is accountable for the good conduct in the business of each person so employed.

    (2) Employees in the employ of a licensee after March 28, 2001 shall meet the qualifications outlined in section 6(1)(c), (e), (j), and (k), be at least 18 years of age, and have had at least an eighth grade education or its equivalent. An employee in the employ of a licensee on or before March 28, 2001 shall meet the qualifications outlined in section 6(1)(d), (e), (j), and (k), be at least 18 years of age, and have had at least an eighth grade education or its equivalent. Employees hired by a licensee after June 21, 2002 shall meet the qualifications outlined in section 6(1)(c), (e), (j), and (k), be at least 18 years of age, and have at least a high school diploma, a GED, or its equivalent.

    (3) A licensee shall keep and maintain in this state adequate and complete personnel information on all persons employed by him or her. A complete employee roster in a manner described by the department shall be filed with the department by each licensee on a quarterly basis. The rosters must be filed with the department by April 15, July 15, October 15, and January 15 for the preceding quarter. Failure to submit accurate rosters is cause for suspension of the license. A renewal application shall not be processed if the quarterly roster has not been received for each quarter of the preceding 2-year license period.

    (4) If a licensee falsely states or represents that a person is or has been in his or her employ, the false statement or representation is sufficient cause for the revocation of the license.

    (5) A person shall not falsely state or represent that he or she is an agent of a licensed security alarm system contractor, private security police officer, private college security force officer, or private security guard. A person who violates this subsection is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 93 days or a fine of not more than $500.00, or both.

History: 1968, Act 330, Imd. Eff. July 12, 1968 ;-- Am. 1969, Act 168, Imd. Eff. Aug. 5, 1969 ;-- Am. 1972, Act 78, Imd. Eff. Mar. 9, 1972 ;-- Am. 1975, Act 190, Imd. Eff. Aug. 5, 1975 ;-- Am. 1994, Act 326, Eff. Mar. 30, 1995 ;-- Am. 2000, Act 411, Eff. Mar. 28, 2001 ;-- Am. 2002, Act 473, Eff. Oct. 1, 2002 ;-- Am. 2010, Act 68, Imd. Eff. May 13, 2010

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1969–2008 · leading case: Moore v. Detroit Ent., LLC, 755 N.W.2d 686 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008).
Moore v. Detroit Ent., LLC, 755 N.W.2d 686 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “§ (2); see [MCL 338.1067, MCL 338.1069]. More critical for present purposes are the undisputed facts that Brown was on duty and on the casino's premises at all times relevant to this case.”
Int'l Union, United Plant Guard Workers v. Dep't of State Police, 373 N.W.2d 713 (Mich. 1985). · cites it 2× “MCL 338.1067, 338.1068; MSA 18.185(17), 18.”
Romanski v. Detroit Ent., L.L.C., 265 F. Supp. 2d 835 (E.D. Mich. 2003). · cites it 2× “Any person seeking a license to become a private security police officer must comply ■with the requirements found in the statute, see Mich. Comp. Laws § 338.1067 , and must comply with the training requirements promulgated by the Michigan Department of Consumer and Industry…”
Hoover Ball & Bearing Co. v. Pinkerton's, Inc., 500 F. Supp. 673 (W.D. Mich. 1980). · cites it 4× “In addition, Count III and a portion of Count V of the Complaint seek to hold defendants Pinkerton and Federal Insurance strictly liable for the acts of Pinkerton’s employee under the provisions of the Private Security Guard Act, MCLA 338.1067 and 338.1059. The parties are…”
Watson v. Aquinas Coll., 268 N.W.2d 342 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). “” MCL 338.1067(1); MSA 18.185(17)(1). (Emphasis supplied.”
Sterling Secret Serv., Inc. v. Dep't of State Police, 174 N.W.2d 298 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). “23 MCLA 1969 Cum Supp § 338.1067 (Stat Ann 1969 Cum Supp § 18.185[17]).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 338.1067(1) — 2 cases
Hoover Ball & Bearing Co. v. Pinkerton's, Inc., 500 F. Supp. 673 (W.D. Mich. 1980). “In addition, Count III and a portion of Count V of the Complaint seek to hold defendants Pinkerton and Federal Insurance strictly liable for the acts of Pinkerton’s employee under the provisions of the Private Security Guard Act, MCLA 338.1067 and 338.1059. The parties are…”
Watson v. Aquinas Coll., 268 N.W.2d 342 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). “” MCL 338.1067(1); MSA 18.185(17)(1). (Emphasis supplied.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.