Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.2101
Short title.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
ELLIOTT-LARSEN CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
Act 453 of 1976
37.2101 Short title.
Sec. 101.
This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Elliott-Larsen civil rights act".
History: 1976, Act 453, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977 ;-- Am. 1977, Act 162, Imd. Eff. Nov. 8, 1977
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1,077
cases (263 in the last 5 years), 1977–2026 · leading case: Hecht v. National Heritage Academies, Inc
Hecht v. National Heritage Academies, Inc (2016)
“, in violation of the Michigan Civil Rights Act (CRA), MCL 37.2101 et seq. Plaintiff had been employed as a teacher by defendant when he made racially charged comments.”
Elezovic v. Ford Motor Co. (2005)
“Plaintiff applied for leave to appeal in this Court, and we granted leave to appeal and directed the parties to include among the issues briefed whether a supervisor engaging in activity prohibited by the *857 Michigan Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq., may be held…”
Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2004)
“" On the basis of these two incidents, plaintiff initiated a lawsuit against defendant alleging breach of contract, violations of the Michigan Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq., and negligence in addressing plaintiff's concerns about sexual harassment in the workplace.”
Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co. (1996)
“We hold that the trial court properly found that plaintiff had failed to sufficiently support a prima facie case of hostile work environment with documentary evidence and therefore affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, which upheld the findings of the trial court.”
White v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. (2008)
“§ 1981 (2000), and Michigan's Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act (the "Elliot-Larsen Act"), Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.2101 et seq. (2002).”
Hamed v. Wayne County (2011)
“Plaintiff resisted these advances, but Johnson transferred plaintiff into an area of the jail not subject to 1 MCL 37.2101 et seq. 2 Wayne County jail regulations require that a female officer be in attendance when female inmates are present.”
Haynie v. Department of State Police (2003)
“Plaintiff claimed the conduct of defendant's employees, "in sexually harassing [d]ecedent Rich, constitutes sexual discrimination in violation of MCL 37.2101 ... et seq." (Emphasis added.”
MacK v. City of Detroit (2002)
“MCL 37.2101 et seq. [10] Moreover, the CRA limits complaints to causes of action for violations of the act itself: A person alleging a violation of this act may bring a civil action for appropriate injunctive relief or damages, or both.”
Sharp v. City of Lansing (2001)
“Both the nature of his claim and his pleadings preclude the availability to him of a parallel constitutional claim.”
McClements v. Ford Motor Co. (2005)
“§ 37.2101 et seq.; and (2) whether an employer can be held liable under the CRA for sexual harassment against a non-employee.”
Major v. Village of Newberry (2016)
“Plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant in circuit court on April 24, 2013, alleging gender discrimination, age discrimination and retaliation under the Michigan Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (CRA), MCL 37.2101 et seq. As a basis for her gender discrimination claim,…”
Joliet v. Pitoniak (2006)
“[11] In Collins , after the plaintiff's employment was terminated by her employer, the plaintiff brought a claim of discriminatory discharge under the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq. There, this Court recognized that "a claim for discriminatory discharge cannot arise until…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.