Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 380.1756 (2026)

Transportation.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE REVISED SCHOOL CODE

Act 451 of 1976

380.1756 Transportation.

Sec. 1756.

The board of a local school district shall provide by contract or agreement for the transportation of a student with a disability who would otherwise be unable to participate in an appropriate special education program or service operated or contracted for by the local school district under section 1751, except for a student with a disability in residence at facilities operated by the department of community health or the department of human services. The board of a school district may provide for weekend transportation of a student with a disability in residence at the Michigan schools for the deaf and blind.

History: 1976, Act 451, Imd. Eff. Jan. 13, 1977 ;-- Am. 2008, Act 1, Imd. Eff. Jan. 11, 2008

PopularName Notes:

Act 451

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2021 · leading case: Schmidt v. Dep't of Educ., 490 N.W.2d 584 (Mich. 1992).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Schmidt v. Dep't of Educ., 490 N.W.2d 584 (Mich. 1992). · cites it 4× “41751 (special education); MCL 380.1756; MSA 15.41756 (special education transportation); MCL 380.”

Durant v. Dep't of Educ., 463 N.W.2d 461 (Mich. Ct. App. 1990). “41711, special education transportation, MCL 380.1756; MSA 15.41756, bilingual instruction in school districts with an enrollment of twenty or more children of limited English-speaking ability in a language classification, MCL 380.”

Sutton v. Cadillac Area Pub. Schs., 323 N.W.2d 582 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). “That the board deemed provision of transportation advisable before the millage proposal was rejected did not require the board to deem provision of transportation advisable thereafter. Plaintiffs would infer a duty on the part of defendants to provide transportation from other…”

Boykins v. Trinity Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2021). “LAWS § 380.1756. Because the compulsion 5 Although the Court finds Plaintiff’s pleading insufficient with respect to the public function theory, it notes that Trinity’s heavy reliance on Santiago v.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.