Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 388.681 (2026)

Reorganization of school districts; definitions.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REORGANIZATION OF SCHOOL DISTRICTS

Act 289 of 1964

388.681 Reorganization of school districts; definitions.

Sec. 1.

As used in this act:

(a) "Reorganization of school districts" means the formation of new school districts, the alteration of boundaries of established school districts, and the dissolution or disorganization of established school districts through or by means of any one or combination of the methods as set forth in this act.

(b) "State committee" means the state committee for the reorganization of school districts created in this act.

(d) "Plan of reorganization" means a concrete proposal for readjustment and realignment of the boundaries of school districts within an intermediate school district area.

(e) "Non-high school district" means a school district presently operating less than a kindergarten through twelfth grade program.

(f) "School code" means Act No. 269 of the Public Acts of 1955, as amended, being sections 340.1 to 340.984 of the Compiled Laws of 1948.

History: 1964, Act 289, Eff. Aug. 28, 1964

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1968–1976 · leading case: Nat'l Ass'n for Advancement of Colored People v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 429 F. Supp. 583 (W.D. Mich. 1976).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Nat'l Ass'n for Advancement of Colored People v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 429 F. Supp. 583 (W.D. Mich. 1976). “§ 388.681 et seq.) required Michigan school districts to operate K-12 systems.”

Penn Sch. Dist. No. 7 v. Lewis Cass Intermediate Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 165 N.W.2d 464 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968). “On February 3, 1967, plaintiffs brought action in Cass county circuit court to enjoin the board of education of the Lewis Cass intermediate school district from conducting a school district reorganization election scheduled to be held on February 14, 1967, pursuant to the…”

Bd. of Educ. of the Intermediate Sch. Dist. v. Bd. of Educ. of the Intermediate Sch. Dist., 168 N.W.2d 306 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 4× “Plaintiffs filed this action to enjoin the school district reorganization election scheduled *413 to be beld September 26, 1966, pursuant to tbe provisions of PA 1964, No 289, MCLA § 388.681 et seq. (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 15.”

Bowman v. Intermediate Sch. Dist., 167 N.W.2d 867 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). “In addition, the trial court held plaintiff Bowman had no standing to challenge boundary changes or school reorganization nor to attack the constitutionality of MOLA § 388.681 et seq. (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 15.”

Boshka v. Bd. of Educ. of the Ottawa Area Intermediate Sch. Dist., 168 N.W.2d 906 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 2× “The complaint asked for injunctive relief and a declaratory judgment as to the constitutionality of PA 1964, No 289, MCLA § 388.681 et seq. (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 15.”

Bd. of Educ. of Sch. Dist. No. 44 v. Intermediate Sch. Dist., 16 Mich. App. 362 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 2× “On appeal plaintiff contends that PA 1964, No 289 (MCLA § 388.681 et seq. • Stat Ann § 15.2299 et seq.”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 388.681(d) — 1 case

Bd. of Educ. of the Intermediate Sch. Dist. v. Bd. of Educ. of the Intermediate Sch. Dist., 168 N.W.2d 306 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). “Plaintiffs filed this action to enjoin the school district reorganization election scheduled *413 to be beld September 26, 1966, pursuant to tbe provisions of PA 1964, No 289, MCLA § 388.681 et seq. (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 15.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.