Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.60

Fraudulent device to obtain relief; liability; misdemeanor; penalty; information to be provided by recipients.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE SOCIAL WELFARE ACT


Act 280 of 1939


400.60 Fraudulent device to obtain relief; liability; misdemeanor; penalty; information to be provided by recipients.

Sec. 60.

    (1) Any person who by means of willful false statement or representation, by impersonation or other fraudulent device, or by using an access device obtains or attempts to obtain, or aids or abets any person to obtain or attempt to obtain, (a) assistance or relief to which the person is not entitled; or (b) a larger amount of assistance or relief than that to which the person is justly entitled; or any officer or employee of a county, city, or district family independence agency who authorizes or recommends relief to persons known to the officer or employee to be ineligible or to have fraudulently created their eligibility; or any person who knowingly buys or aids or abets in buying or in disposal of the property of a person receiving assistance or relief without the consent of the director or supervisor of the state department shall, if the amount involved shall be of the value of $500.00 or less, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall, if the amount involved shall be of the value of more than $500.00, be deemed guilty of a felony, and upon conviction shall be punished as provided by the laws of this state. The amount involved as used in this subsection shall be defined as the difference between the lawful amount of assistance or aid and the amount of assistance or aid actually received. If anyone receives assistance or relief through means enumerated in this section, in which prosecution is deemed unnecessary, the state department or county departments may take the necessary steps to recover from the recipient the amount involved, plus interest at 5% per annum. On conviction of the violation of the provisions of this section of any officer or employee of any county, city, or district department of social welfare, the officer or employee shall be removed or dismissed from office. For the purpose of this subsection, "access device" means that term as it is defined in section 300a of the Michigan penal code, 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.300a.

    (2) There is imposed upon every person receiving relief under this act either upon the person's own application or by the person's inclusion, to his or her knowledge, in the application of another the continuing obligation to supply to the department issuing the relief: (a) the complete circumstances in regard to the person's income from employment or from any other source or the existence of income, if known to the person, of other persons receiving relief through the same application; (b) information regarding each and every offer of employment for the person or, if known to him or her, of the other persons receiving relief through the same application; (c) information concerning changes in the person's circumstances or those of other persons receiving relief through the same application which would decrease the need for relief; and (d) the circumstances or whereabouts, known to the person, of relatives legally responsible for the person's support or for the support of other persons receiving relief through the same application if changes in those circumstances or whereabouts could affect the amount of assistance available from those relatives or affect their legal liability to furnish support. Any person who shall neglect or refuse to submit to the department issuing relief the information required by this section, if the amount of relief granted as a result of the neglect or refusal is less than $500.00, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and if the amount of relief granted as a result of the neglect or refusal is $500.00 or more, is guilty of a felony, and upon conviction shall be punished as provided by the laws of this state.

History: 1939, Act 280, Imd. Eff. June 16, 1939 ;-- CL 1948, 400.60 ;-- Am. 1950, Ex. Sess., Act 18, Eff. Mar. 31, 1951 ;-- Am. 1969, Act 179, Imd. Eff. Aug. 5, 1969 ;-- Am. 1999, Act 194, Imd. Eff. Dec. 1, 1999

PopularName Notes:

Act 280
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1951–2023 · leading case: People v. Vargo
People v. Vargo (1984) michctapp · cites it 5× “Defendant Stanley Vargo was convicted of welfare fraud over $500, MCL 400.60(2); MSA 16.460(2), following a jury trial in the Tuscola County Circuit Court.”
People v. Ramos (1988) mich · cites it 8× “MCL 400.60; MSA 16.460. The first statute penalizes conduct that is material to the agency's determination of eligibility, the second to the actual outcome of the agency's action.”
People v. Joseph (1999) michctapp · cites it 5× “Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of welfare fraud as a result of violating MCL 400.60(2); MSA 16.460(2). The trial court sentenced defendant to three years’ probation with six months in jail; however, it imposed only one day in jail (giving her credit for one day…”
People v. Henderson (1978) michctapp · cites it 2× “See MCLA 400.60; MSA 16.460. As to defendant, Ms.”
People v. Killingsworth (1977) michctapp · cites it 2× “Charles and Sharon Killingsworth appeal by right their jury convictions for welfare fraud, MCLA 400.60(2); MSA 16.460(2). It was alleged that Sharon Killingsworth applied for and received public assistance benefits (ADC), and that she continued to receive them while breaching…”
People v. Watt (1982) michctapp “Defendant, Nancy Watt, was convicted by a jury of two counts of welfare fraud, in violation of subsections 1 and 2 of MCL 400.60; MSA 16.460. Defendant was sentenced to 5 years probation, with the first 30 days to be served in the county jail, and was ordered to make restitution…”
People v. Akerley (1977) michctapp · cites it 2× “Defendant Mary Akerley was convicted, following a nonjury trial, of neglect or *323 refusal to report changes in her circumstances with respect to eligibility for welfare benefits, in violation of MCLA 400.60(2); MSA 16.460(2). At the same trial defendant Donald Akerley was…”
People v. Smith (1978) michctapp · cites it 4× “MCL 400.60; MSA 16.460 provides in part that: "Any person who by means of wilful false statement *379 or representation or by impersonation or other fraudulent device obtains or attempts to obtain, or aids or abets any person to obtain (a) assistance or relief to which he is not…”
In Re Davis'estate (1951) mich “There is no occasion to consider or discuss here whether reimbursement might be had under section 60 of the act (CL 1948, § 400.60 [Stat Ann 1950 Rev § 16.460]) [**] by claiming that the assistance had been obtained by false representations or fraud.”
People v. Jemison (1991) michctapp “Defendant was convicted by a jury of two counts of welfare fraud, MCL 400.60; MSA 16.460, one count of conspiracy to commit welfare fraud, MCL 750.”
Gedvick v. Hill (1952) mich “” CL 1948, § 400.60 (Stat Ann 1949 Cum Supp § 16.460).”
Evans v. Department of Social Services (1970) michctapp “3 Section 60 of the act, MOLA § 400.60 (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 16.460), makes it a crime for one to obtain by fraudulent devices a larger amount of assistance than that to which he is entitled, 4 Under the Social Welfare Act, an ADC claimant denied assistance is entitled to a fair…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.60(1) — 7 cases
People v. Ramos (1988) mich “MCL 400.60; MSA 16.460. The first statute penalizes conduct that is material to the agency's determination of eligibility, the second to the actual outcome of the agency's action.”
People v. Evans (1983) michctapp
People v. Smith (1978) michctapp “MCL 400.60; MSA 16.460 provides in part that: "Any person who by means of wilful false statement *379 or representation or by impersonation or other fraudulent device obtains or attempts to obtain, or aids or abets any person to obtain (a) assistance or relief to which he is not…”
Zdebski v. Schmucker (2013) mied
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.60(2) — 13 cases
People v. Vargo (1984) michctapp “Defendant Stanley Vargo was convicted of welfare fraud over $500, MCL 400.60(2); MSA 16.460(2), following a jury trial in the Tuscola County Circuit Court.”
People v. Killingsworth (1977) michctapp “Charles and Sharon Killingsworth appeal by right their jury convictions for welfare fraud, MCLA 400.60(2); MSA 16.460(2). It was alleged that Sharon Killingsworth applied for and received public assistance benefits (ADC), and that she continued to receive them while breaching…”
People v. Joseph (1999) michctapp “Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of welfare fraud as a result of violating MCL 400.60(2); MSA 16.460(2). The trial court sentenced defendant to three years’ probation with six months in jail; however, it imposed only one day in jail (giving her credit for one day…”
People v. Akerley (1977) michctapp “Defendant Mary Akerley was convicted, following a nonjury trial, of neglect or *323 refusal to report changes in her circumstances with respect to eligibility for welfare benefits, in violation of MCLA 400.60(2); MSA 16.460(2). At the same trial defendant Donald Akerley was…”
People v. Mast (1983) michctapp
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.60(2)(a) — 2 cases
People v. Joseph (1999) michctapp “Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of welfare fraud as a result of violating MCL 400.60(2); MSA 16.460(2). The trial court sentenced defendant to three years’ probation with six months in jail; however, it imposed only one day in jail (giving her credit for one day…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.60(2)(c) — 2 cases
People v. Joseph (1999) michctapp “Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of welfare fraud as a result of violating MCL 400.60(2); MSA 16.460(2). The trial court sentenced defendant to three years’ probation with six months in jail; however, it imposed only one day in jail (giving her credit for one day…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.