Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 400 / Act 225 of 2011
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.665 (2026)

Extended guardianship assistance; initial and subsequent eligibility; determination.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Aug. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

YOUNG ADULT VOLUNTARY FOSTER CARE ACT


Act 225 of 2011


400.665 Extended guardianship assistance; initial and subsequent eligibility; determination.

Sec. 25.

    (1) The department may provide extended guardianship assistance for a youth, who is at least 18 years of age but less than 21 years of age, if the youth began receiving guardianship assistance at 16 years of age or older.

    (2) The department shall determine a youth's initial and subsequent eligibility for extended guardianship assistance in accordance with the state's approved title IV-E plan.

History: 2011, Act 225, Imd. Eff. Nov. 22, 2011

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: 20230221_C361537_45_361537.Opn.Pdf, No. 20230221 (Mich. Ct. App. Feb. 21, 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
20230221_C361537_45_361537.Opn.Pdf, No. 20230221 (Mich. Ct. App. Feb. 21, 2023). · cites it 2× “” Similarly, Article III of the YAVFCA, MCL 400.665(1), states that the DHHS “may provide extended guardianship assistance for a youth, who is at least 18 years of age but less than 21 years of age, if the youth began receiving guardianship assistance at 16 years of age or older.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.665(1): 1 case
20230221_C361537_45_361537.Opn.Pdf, No. 20230221 (Mich. Ct. App. Feb. 21, 2023). “” Similarly, Article III of the YAVFCA, MCL 400.665(1), states that the DHHS “may provide extended guardianship assistance for a youth, who is at least 18 years of age but less than 21 years of age, if the youth began receiving guardianship assistance at 16 years of age or older.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.