Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.725 (2026)

Contested case hearing; judicial review.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ADULT FOSTER CARE FACILITY LICENSING ACT

Act 218 of 1979

400.725 Contested case hearing; judicial review.

Sec. 25.

A party aggrieved by the decision of the director following a contested case hearing under section 22 may seek judicial review in accordance with chapter 6 of the administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.301 to 24.306.

History: 1979, Act 218, Eff. Mar. 27, 1980 ;-- Am. 2018, Act 558, Eff. Mar. 28, 2019

Compiler's Notes:

For transfer of powers and duties of state fire marshal to department of labor and economic growth, bureau of construction codes and fire safety, by type II transfer, see E.R.O. No. 2003-1, compiled at MCL 445.2011.

For transfer of powers and duties of the bureau of family services from the department of consumer and industry services to the family independence agency by Type II transfer, see E.R.O. No. 2003-1, compiled at MCL 445.2011.

For transfer of powers and duties of adult foster care licensing advisory council to the family independence agency by Type II transfer, see E.R.O. No. 2003-1, compiled at MCL 445.2011.

For transfer of powers and duties pertaining to adult foster care, adult foster care facility, adult foster care camp, adult camp, adult foster care family home, and adult foster care group home licensing and regulation from department of human services to department of licensing and regulatory affairs, see E.R.O. No. 2015-1, compiled at MCL 400.227.

For transfer of powers and duties pertaining to children's camp, child care center, day care center, family day care home, and group day care home licensing and regulation from department of human services to department of licensing and regulatory affairs, see E.R.O. No. 2015-1, compiled at MCL 400.227.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1985–2009 · leading case: Palo Grp. Foster Care, Inc. v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 577 N.W.2d 200 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Palo Grp. Foster Care, Inc. v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 577 N.W.2d 200 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “i Petitioner first argues that because the appeal to the circuit court was based on § 25 of the Adult Foster Care Facility Licensing Act, MCL 400.725; MSA 16.610(75), the circuit court was obliged to engage in review de novo on appeal.”

City of Livonia v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 378 N.W.2d 402 (Mich. 1985). “MCL 400.725; MSA 16.610(75). Turning to plaintiffs’ arguments concerning the adequacy of notice and hearing, we initially conclude that the afcfla provides adequate notice to a city and nearby property owners prior to a proposed licensure.”

Allstate Ins. v. Frankel, 259 F.R.D. 274 (E.D. Mich. 2009). · cites it 2× “713 (which provides that before issuing or renewing a license for an adult foster care facility, the department shall investigate the activities and standards of care as well as perform an on-site evaluation of the facility); (2) MCLA § 400.”

Palo Grp. v. Dss, 577 N.W.2d 200 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “§ 400.725; M.S.A. § 16.610(75), the circuit court was obliged to engage in review de novo on appeal.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.