UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
Act 174 of 1962
440.6101 Repealed. 1998, Act 489, Imd. Eff. Jan. 4, 1999.
Repealed. 1998, Act 489, Imd. Eff. Jan. 4, 1999.
Compiler's Notes:
Enacting section 2 of Act 489 of 1998 provides:
“Enacting section 2. Rights and obligations that arose under article 6 before article 6 was repealed remain valid and may be enforced as if article 6 had not been repealed.”
Notes of Decisions
Kraft v. Dr. Leonard's Healthcare Corp., 646 F. Supp. 2d 882 (E.D. Mich. 2009).
· cites it 2× “In the context of Michigan’s Bulk Transfers Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.6101 et seq., the Michigan Court of Appeals relied on Black’s Law Dictionary to determine the meaning of “manufacture” relevant to that statute.”
Koons v. Walker, 257 N.W.2d 229 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977).
“Basically, defendant argues that the only way it could possibly be liable for its business predecessor’s sale of a defective product would be if there was found to have been a violation of the bulk sales provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, MCLA 440.”
Sentinel Ins. Co. v. JPaul Jones, L.P. (W.D. Mich. 2021).
· cites it 2× “Tubelite required interpretation of the Bulk Transfers Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.6101 et seq., a different statute than the one at issue here.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.