Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 445 / Act 224 of 1966

Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.851

Retail installment sales act; short title.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALES ACT


Act 224 of 1966


445.851 Retail installment sales act; short title.

Sec. 1.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "retail installment sales act".

History: 1966, Act 224, Eff. Mar. 10, 1967

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1971–2024 · leading case: First of America Bank v. Thompson
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
First of America Bank v. Thompson (1996) michctapp · cites it 2× “* 2 Plaintiff asserts that while the Retail Installment Sales Act, MCL 445.851 et seq.; MSA 19.416(101) et seq.”
Van Vels v. Premier Athletic Center of Plainfield, Inc. (1998) miwd · cites it 2× “Laws Section 445.851 et seq. The MRISA allegations are proposed in order to seek statutory damages under MRISA against the assignee Defendants for the financing disclosure violations.”
Janda v. Riley-Meggs Industries, Inc. (1991) mied “§ 445.851 et seq.); and (3) constituted an invasion of privacy and misappropriation of plaintiff’s name and reputation for defendants’ commercial advantage.”
Silver v. International Paper Co. (1971) michctapp · cites it 2× “4 PA 1966, No 224, MCLA § 445.851 et seq. (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 19.”
Cicelski v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (1984) michctapp “Part of plaintiffs’ original cause of action was based upon the Michigan Retail Installment Sales Act (MRISA), MCL 445.851 et seq.; MSA 19.416(101) et seq.”
Grigg v. Robinson Furniture Co. (1977) michctapp “The next significant event occurred on March *720 10, 1967, the effective date of Michigan’s Retail Installment Sales Act (MRISA), 1966 PA 224 ; MCLA 445.851 et seq.; MSA 19.416(101) et seq.”
Michigan Mobile Homeowners Ass'n v. Bank of the Commonwealth (1974) michctapp “416(102)(c) which clearly brought the retail sale of mobile homes within the provisions of the Retail Installment Sales Act, MCLA 445.851 et seq.; MSA 19.416(101) et seq.”
McLeod v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (In Re McLeod) (2000) mieb · cites it 4× “3-4 (differentiating between definitions under the Vermont statute for retail installment contract, which includes a security agreement, and retail charge agreement, which does not), urith Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 445.851 (g)-(h) (Supp.”
Aldens, Inc. v. Packel (1975) ca3 “…; Ill.Rev.Stat., Ch. 12P/2 §§ 501-33; Me.Rev.Stat.Ann., Tit. 9, §§ 3981-92; Md.Ann.Code, Art. 83, §§ 153A-I; Mich.Comp.Laws, §§ 445.851- ; Minn.Stat. §§ 334.16-18; Miss.Code, § 75-17-1; Mont.Rev.Codes, §§ 74-601-12; Nebr. Rev.Stat., §§ 45-204-08; 74-601-12; Nebr. Rev.…”
Craft v. Ratti (In Re Craft) (1989) mieb · cites it 2× “That type of transaction fell within the net of RISA.”
Corrigan v. Insilco Corp. (1989) michctapp “Defendants argue that it is regulated by the Retail Installment Sales Act (risa), MCL 445.851 et seq.; MSA 19.416(101) et seq.”
L E Marlowe & Sons, Ltd v. Farner (1987) michctapp “During the pendency of the action in the trial court and prior to entry of judgment, 1972 PA 191 was enacted, effective June 21, 1972, which changed certain statutory language and clearly *198 brought the retail sales of mobile homes within the provisions of the Retail…”
Show all 16 citing cases →
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.851(3) — 1 case
Bear v. Credit Acceptance Corporation (2023) mied
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.