Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.1101
Short title.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT
Act 284 of 1972
450.1101 Short title.
Sec. 101.
This act shall be known and may be cited as the "business corporation act".
History: 1972, Act 284, Eff. Jan. 1, 1973
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 86
cases (17 in the last 5 years), 1973–2026 · leading case: Craig v. Oakwood Hospital
Craig v. Oakwood Hospital (2004)
“] An individual may not become a shareholder in a professional services corporation unless he or she is a "licensed person.”
Green v. Ziegelman (2015)
“, and the Business Corporation Act, MCL 450.1101 et seq. The trial court later entered a stipulated order involving the 2010 case.”
Ross v. Auto Club Group (2008)
“I would further require plaintiff to offer proof on remand of the true measure of income from work that is necessary to put him in the same, but no better, position than the one he occupied before his accident.”
William Miller v. Allstate Ins Co (2008)
“We granted leave to appeal to consider: (1) whether plaintiff corporation was improperly incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (BCA), MCL 450.1101 et seq.; and, if so, (2) whether an improperly incorporated entity rendering physical therapy treatment has “lawfully”…”
Churella v. Pioneer State Mutual Insurance (2003)
“§ 450.1101 et seq., does not apply to insurance companies.”
Gold v. Winget (In Re NM Holdings Co.) (2009)
“(2) A transfer made by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor whose claim arose before the transfer was made if the transfer *250 was made to an insider for an antecedent debt, the debtor was insolvent at that time, and the insider had reasonable cause to believe that the…”
Duray Development, LLC v. Perrin (2010)
“No taxable costs pursuant to MCR 7.219, neither party having prevailed in full.”
Ben P. Fyke & Sons v. Gunter Co. (1973)
“The new Business Corporation Act ( 1972 PA 284 ; MCLA 450.1101 et seq.; MSA 21.200[101] et seq.”
Edward Gallagher v. Kathleen Persha (2016)
“, and the Business Corporation Act, MCL 450.1101 et seq. Id. After a bench trial, the trial court found that the corporate form should be disregarded, that the actions of the defendants violated the two state laws, and entered a judgment finding the defendants jointly and…”
Madugula v. Taub (2014)
“1489 (§ 489) of the Business Corporation Act (BCA), MCL 450.1101 et seq., provides a right to a jury trial or whether claims under § 489 are instead required to be heard by a court of equity.”
Kravitz v. Summersett (In re Great Lakes Comnet, Inc.) (2018)
“In his Response, the Trustee clarifies that he is alleging LaRocca breached the duty of care, not the duties of loyalty and good faith, under the Michigan Business Corporation Act, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 450.1101 et seq. (1989) (the "MBCA").”
Burrows v. bidigare/bublys, Inc (1987)
“] It is defendants' claim that application of the statute was in error because, if allowed the opportunity, defendants would have shown that the defendant corporation was originally incorporated under the Business Corporation Act, MCL 450.1101 et seq.; MSA 21.200(101) et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.