Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 450 / Act 23 of 1993
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.4101 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ACT


Act 23 of 1993


450.4101 Short title.

Sec. 101.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Michigan limited liability company act".

History: 1993, Act 23, Eff. June 1, 1993

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 44 cases (15 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: Duray Dev., LLC v. Perrin, 792 N.W.2d 749 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Duray Dev., LLC v. Perrin, 792 N.W.2d 749 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “However, we reverse the judgment of the trial court that the de facto corporation doctrine cannot apply to limited liability companies, and we reverse the trial court’s decision to bar defendants from calling witnesses. Accordingly, we remand for further proceedings in…”
Altobelli v. Hartmann, 884 N.W.2d 537 (Mich. 2016). “FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In 1993, plaintiff Dean Altobelli began working as an attorney for Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, PLC (the Firm), a professional limited liability company formed under the Michigan Limited Liability Company Act (MLLCA), MCL 450.4101 et seq.…”
Salem Springs, LLC v. Salem Twp., 312 Mich. App. 210 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “Even supposing for the sake of argument that Salem Springs Owner’s mere ownership of the property establishes citizenship for Salem Springs Owner in Washtenaw County, neither plaintiffs former ownership of the property nor its management of Salem Springs Owner confers this…”
Daystar Seller Fin. LLC v. Patrick Hundley, 931 N.W.2d 15 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “, and the Limited Liability Company Act, MCL 450.4101 et seq . See MCL 450.2002(2) (stating that the Business Corporation Act does not "authorize this state to regulate the organization or internal affairs of a foreign corporation") (emphasis added) and MCL 450.”
Frank v. Linkner, 871 N.W.2d 363 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “B. WHICH CLAIMS FALL UNDER THE LLCA? Although the trial court dismissed all of plaintiffs’ claims under the relevant time restrictions in the LLCA, plaintiffs cite only their claims for breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract as falling outside that statute.”
Int'l Flavors & Textures, LLC v. Gardner, 966 F. Supp. 552 (W.D. Mich. 1997). “§ 450.4101 et seq. IFT’s principal place of business is located in Kentwood, Michigan.”
Boesky v. Siegel, 305 F. Supp. 3d 779 (E.D. Mich. 2018). · cites it 2× “As a consequence, Boesky filed suit, on June 28, 2017, asserting a violation of Michigan's Limited Liability Company Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.4101 et seq. , and a violation of the company's operating agreement.”
Fisher v. Blackmore, 325 F. Supp. 2d 810 (E.D. Mich. 2004). · cites it 2× “See Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.4101 et seq.; PL Br.”
Altobelli v. Hartmann, 861 N.W.2d 913 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “THE FIRM’S OPERATING AGREEMENT Miller Canfield is a professional limited liability company under the Limited Liability Company Act (LLCA), MCL 450.4101 et seq. The internal affairs of the firm are governed by the Miller Canfield Operating Agreement.”
Uzielli v. Frank, 137 F. App'x 795 (6th Cir. 2005). “On January 25, 2001, Plaintiff and his uncle, Philip Uzielli, formed Alph Company, LLC (“Alph”), under the Michigan Limited Liability Company Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.4101 , et seq. Alph’s principal place of business is Detroit, Michigan.”
Joby Clark v. Butoku Karate Sch. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “A member withdrawing pursuant to an operating agreement may become entitled to a withdrawal distribution as described in section 305.”
Phares a Noel II v. Scholastic Solutions LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “, the Michigan Limited Liability Company Act, MCL 450.4101 et seq.]. These books and records will be kept at the Company’s Registered Office and shall be available to all members during regular business hours.”
Show all 44 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.