Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.16a (2026)
Repealed. 2001, Act 107, Eff. Sept. 30, 2001.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Revised Statutes of 1846
R.S. of 1846
552.16a Repealed. 2001, Act 107, Eff. Sept. 30, 2001.
Repealed. 2001, Act 107, Eff. Sept. 30, 2001.
Compiler's Notes:
The repealed section pertained to support of child after child reaches 18 years of age.
PopularName Notes:
No-Fault DivorceNotes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1991–2016 · leading case: Weaver v. Giffels, 895 N.W.2d 555 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016).
Weaver v. Giffels, 895 N.W.2d 555 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “In 1990, however, the Legislature enacted MCL 552.16a, which provided a narrow exception to the general rule that support obligations end at the age of majority.”
Rowley v. Garvin, 562 N.W.2d 262 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). “The trial court found that the daughter qualified for continuation of child support as a “full-time student” pursuant to MCL 552.16a; MSA 25.96(1). We reverse and remand.”
Lee v. Smith, 871 N.W.2d 873 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “16a, as enacted by 1990 PA 243 , provided the following: (2) Beginning on the effective date of this section, the court may order support for the time a child is regularly attending high school on a full-time basis with a reasonable expectation of completing sufficient credits…”
Holmes v. Holmes, 760 N.W.2d 300 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “The Michigan Legislature subsequently enacted MCL 552.16a “in response to” Smith’s conclusion that “Michigan law did not provide for postmajority support.”
Thompson v. Merritt, 481 N.W.2d 735 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991). “MCL 552.16a; MSA 25.96(1). In his next issue, defendant argues that portions of the Paternity Act amount to impermissible gender-based discrimination in violation of the equal protection clauses of the state and federal constitutions.”
Bennett v. Bennett, 496 N.W.2d 353 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992). “” While the matter was pending before this Court during the original appeal, the Legislature enacted 1990 PA 243 ; MCL 552.16a(2); MSA 25.96(1)(2), effective October 10, 1990, which, with some restrictions, authorized the awarding of child sup *499 port until age 19 Vi where the…”
Blakley v. Blakley, 534 N.W.2d 147 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995). “MCL 552.16a(2); MSA 25.96(1)(2). The amendment added MCL 552.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.16a(2) — 2 cases
Bennett v. Bennett, 496 N.W.2d 353 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992). “” While the matter was pending before this Court during the original appeal, the Legislature enacted 1990 PA 243 ; MCL 552.16a(2); MSA 25.96(1)(2), effective October 10, 1990, which, with some restrictions, authorized the awarding of child sup *499 port until age 19 Vi where the…”
Blakley v. Blakley, 534 N.W.2d 147 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995). “MCL 552.16a(2); MSA 25.96(1)(2). The amendment added MCL 552.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.16a(3) — 1 case
Rowley v. Garvin, 562 N.W.2d 262 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). “The trial court found that the daughter qualified for continuation of child support as a “full-time student” pursuant to MCL 552.16a; MSA 25.96(1). We reverse and remand.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.16a(4) — 1 case
Blakley v. Blakley, 534 N.W.2d 147 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995). “MCL 552.16a(2); MSA 25.96(1)(2). The amendment added MCL 552.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.16a(4)(b) — 1 case
Blakley v. Blakley, 534 N.W.2d 147 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995). “MCL 552.16a(2); MSA 25.96(1)(2). The amendment added MCL 552.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.